Water in Gaza: Problems and Prospects

C. Messerschmid
{"title":"Water in Gaza: Problems and Prospects","authors":"C. Messerschmid","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.1764252","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Messerschmid starts by comparing conditions in the West Bank, which is rich in groundwater of excellent quality but largely under Israeli control, with conditions in Gaza, which has hardly any appreciable recharge from rain and a water supply that is almost entirely contaminated. The coastal aquifer constitutes the only source of water directly available to the Gaza Strip itself, given its total, forced separation from the West Bank. Decreasing water levels increase the natural inflows of saline groundwater and the largest source of pollution resides in the large amounts of untreated or insufficiently treated waste water infiltrating into the aquifer. The 1967 occupation, compounded by the total siege in place since 2007, has prevented the building of a single modern and sufficiently sized waste water treatment plant, so pollution has increased. In exploring solutions, he says that local and international experts urge waste water treatment, transfers from the West Bank aquifer, and most of all, desalination. In reality, he says, waste water treatment will only meet a very small percentage of needs; transfer from the West Bank is politically and physically unrealistic (Israel will prevent it; the Hebron area itself faces a water shortage); and desalination, a hugely expensive project, subjects Gaza to constant Israeli blackmail through the threat to destroy plants or to withhold the energy, inputs, or expertise needed to run them. The only solution, he concludes, is one whereby legal pressure and economic incentives bring about equitable water sharing by way of transfers from Israel.","PeriodicalId":346805,"journal":{"name":"Natural Resources Law & Policy eJournal","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural Resources Law & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.1764252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

Messerschmid starts by comparing conditions in the West Bank, which is rich in groundwater of excellent quality but largely under Israeli control, with conditions in Gaza, which has hardly any appreciable recharge from rain and a water supply that is almost entirely contaminated. The coastal aquifer constitutes the only source of water directly available to the Gaza Strip itself, given its total, forced separation from the West Bank. Decreasing water levels increase the natural inflows of saline groundwater and the largest source of pollution resides in the large amounts of untreated or insufficiently treated waste water infiltrating into the aquifer. The 1967 occupation, compounded by the total siege in place since 2007, has prevented the building of a single modern and sufficiently sized waste water treatment plant, so pollution has increased. In exploring solutions, he says that local and international experts urge waste water treatment, transfers from the West Bank aquifer, and most of all, desalination. In reality, he says, waste water treatment will only meet a very small percentage of needs; transfer from the West Bank is politically and physically unrealistic (Israel will prevent it; the Hebron area itself faces a water shortage); and desalination, a hugely expensive project, subjects Gaza to constant Israeli blackmail through the threat to destroy plants or to withhold the energy, inputs, or expertise needed to run them. The only solution, he concludes, is one whereby legal pressure and economic incentives bring about equitable water sharing by way of transfers from Israel.
加沙的水:问题与前景
梅塞施密德首先比较了西岸和加沙的情况。西岸有丰富的优质地下水,但大部分都在以色列的控制之下,而加沙几乎没有雨水补给,供水也几乎完全受到污染。沿海含水层是加沙地带本身直接获得的唯一水源,因为它完全被迫与西岸分离。水位的下降增加了含盐地下水的自然流入,而最大的污染源是大量未经处理或处理不充分的废水渗入含水层。1967年的占领,加上2007年以来的全面包围,使得一座现代化的、规模足够大的污水处理厂无法建成,因此污染加剧。他说,在探索解决方案的过程中,当地和国际专家敦促进行废水处理,从西岸含水层转移,最重要的是进行海水淡化。他说,实际上,废水处理只能满足很小一部分需求;从西岸的转移在政治上和物理上都是不现实的(以色列会阻止它;希布伦地区本身面临缺水);而海水淡化这个耗资巨大的项目,使加沙不断受到以色列的讹诈,威胁要摧毁工厂,或扣留运行工厂所需的能源、投入或专业知识。他总结道,唯一的解决办法是,通过法律压力和经济激励,通过从以色列转移用水的方式实现公平的水资源共享。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信