Re-planning for a successful project schedule

A. Rainer, M. Shepperd
{"title":"Re-planning for a successful project schedule","authors":"A. Rainer, M. Shepperd","doi":"10.1109/METRIC.1999.809728","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Time-to-market or project duration has increasing significance for commercial software development. We report on a longitudinal study of a project at IBM Hursley Park. The focus of this study was schedule behaviour; however, we explored a range of related factors, including planned versus actual progress, resource allocation and functionality delivered. In the course of the 12-month study, evidence was collected from eight interviews, 49 project meetings, a number of project documents and a feedback workshop. The project leader considered the project to be a success, not only in terms of satisfying resource and schedule objectives, but also in the marketplace. Whilst many of the originally planned external commitments were met, it is clear that the project did not adhere to its original (detailed) plan and indeed there were no less than seven re-plans. These re-plans were mainly in response to mis-estimates in the original plan, rather than in response to the introduction of additional requirements (of which there were several) or problems with external dependencies. Furthermore, these re-plans suggest a distinction between the nature of the initial planning process and the nature of the re-planning process during the project. Attention is also directed at the implications these re-plans have for software metrics and cost estimation research.","PeriodicalId":372331,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings Sixth International Software Metrics Symposium (Cat. No.PR00403)","volume":"109 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings Sixth International Software Metrics Symposium (Cat. No.PR00403)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/METRIC.1999.809728","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Time-to-market or project duration has increasing significance for commercial software development. We report on a longitudinal study of a project at IBM Hursley Park. The focus of this study was schedule behaviour; however, we explored a range of related factors, including planned versus actual progress, resource allocation and functionality delivered. In the course of the 12-month study, evidence was collected from eight interviews, 49 project meetings, a number of project documents and a feedback workshop. The project leader considered the project to be a success, not only in terms of satisfying resource and schedule objectives, but also in the marketplace. Whilst many of the originally planned external commitments were met, it is clear that the project did not adhere to its original (detailed) plan and indeed there were no less than seven re-plans. These re-plans were mainly in response to mis-estimates in the original plan, rather than in response to the introduction of additional requirements (of which there were several) or problems with external dependencies. Furthermore, these re-plans suggest a distinction between the nature of the initial planning process and the nature of the re-planning process during the project. Attention is also directed at the implications these re-plans have for software metrics and cost estimation research.
重新规划一个成功的项目时间表
上市时间或项目持续时间对于商业软件开发越来越重要。我们报告了IBM赫斯利公园一个项目的纵向研究。这项研究的重点是计划行为;然而,我们探索了一系列相关的因素,包括计划的与实际的进度、资源分配和交付的功能。在为期12个月的研究过程中,从8次面谈、49次项目会议、若干项目文件和一次反馈讲习班收集了证据。项目负责人认为项目是成功的,不仅在满足资源和进度目标方面,而且在市场上也是成功的。虽然许多最初计划的外部承诺得到了满足,但很明显,该项目没有遵守其最初(详细)计划,实际上有不下七次重新计划。这些重新计划主要是对原始计划中错误估计的响应,而不是对引入额外需求(其中有几个)或外部依赖性问题的响应。此外,这些重新规划表明了在项目期间初始规划过程的性质和重新规划过程的性质之间的区别。注意这些重新计划对软件度量和成本估算研究的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信