“I didn’t know women could have haemophilia”: A qualitative case study

Simon Fletcher
{"title":"“I didn’t know women could have haemophilia”: A qualitative case study","authors":"Simon Fletcher","doi":"10.2478/jhp-2022-0011","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction There is a historic but persistent belief in haemophilia care that women do not suffer with the condition, they merely carry and transmit it. However, around 250 women worldwide are known to have factor levels within the severe to moderate haemophilia range (<1 IU/dL to 5 IU/dL), and the true figure may be greater than this. The experience of these women may be the same as or similar to those of men with similar factor levels, but there may be significant differences. What these differences are and what they mean to the women affected are not well understood as their voices are not heard. This case study highlights the issues and experiences of one woman living severe haemophilia. Methods A single semi-structured qualitative interview was undertaken to explore the experiences of a young woman who has factor VIII levels of <1 IU/dL. The interview was recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. Results Four interlinked themes were identified: recognition, self-advocacy, identity and access to treatment. Conclusion This case study indicates that, despite recent attempts to improve the diagnostic nomenclature, women and girls with haemophilia continue to find it difficult to access similar levels of care to men and boys. As such, they may fail to achieve parity in terms of safety, integrity and wellbeing, and have a reduced quality of life. If women and girls affected by haemophilia are to receive levels of treatment comparable to men, diagnostic criteria need to change further. Focusing on genotype, levels of factor expressed and phenotypical presentation rather than biological sex will acknowledge and validate their experiences, and improve treatment for all people with haemophilia in the future.","PeriodicalId":372940,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Haemophilia Practice","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Haemophilia Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/jhp-2022-0011","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Introduction There is a historic but persistent belief in haemophilia care that women do not suffer with the condition, they merely carry and transmit it. However, around 250 women worldwide are known to have factor levels within the severe to moderate haemophilia range (<1 IU/dL to 5 IU/dL), and the true figure may be greater than this. The experience of these women may be the same as or similar to those of men with similar factor levels, but there may be significant differences. What these differences are and what they mean to the women affected are not well understood as their voices are not heard. This case study highlights the issues and experiences of one woman living severe haemophilia. Methods A single semi-structured qualitative interview was undertaken to explore the experiences of a young woman who has factor VIII levels of <1 IU/dL. The interview was recorded, transcribed and thematically analysed. Results Four interlinked themes were identified: recognition, self-advocacy, identity and access to treatment. Conclusion This case study indicates that, despite recent attempts to improve the diagnostic nomenclature, women and girls with haemophilia continue to find it difficult to access similar levels of care to men and boys. As such, they may fail to achieve parity in terms of safety, integrity and wellbeing, and have a reduced quality of life. If women and girls affected by haemophilia are to receive levels of treatment comparable to men, diagnostic criteria need to change further. Focusing on genotype, levels of factor expressed and phenotypical presentation rather than biological sex will acknowledge and validate their experiences, and improve treatment for all people with haemophilia in the future.
“我不知道女性会得血友病”:一个定性案例研究
在血友病护理中,有一个历史悠久但持久的信念,即妇女并不患有这种疾病,她们只是携带和传播它。然而,已知全世界约有250名妇女的因子水平在严重至中度血友病范围内(<1 IU/dL至5 IU/dL),真实数字可能大于此。这些女性的经历可能与具有相似因素水平的男性相同或相似,但可能存在显著差异。这些差异是什么,以及它们对受影响的妇女意味着什么,人们没有很好地理解,因为她们的声音没有被听到。本案例研究强调了一名患有严重血友病的妇女的问题和经历。方法采用单次半结构化定性访谈,探讨因子VIII水平<1 IU/dL的年轻女性的经历。这次采访被记录下来,并进行了主题分析。结果确定了四个相互关联的主题:认识,自我倡导,身份和获得治疗。本案例研究表明,尽管最近尝试改进诊断术语,但患有血友病的妇女和女孩仍然难以获得与男性和男孩相似的护理水平。因此,他们可能无法在安全、诚信和福祉方面实现平等,生活质量也会下降。如果要使受血友病影响的妇女和女孩获得与男性相当的治疗水平,则需要进一步改变诊断标准。关注基因型、因子表达水平和表型表现,而不是生物性别,将承认和验证他们的经历,并在未来改善对所有血友病患者的治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信