Trade-offs Between Query Difficulty and Sample Complexity in Crowdsourced Data Acquisition

Hye Won Chung, J. Lee, Doyeon Kim, A. Hero
{"title":"Trade-offs Between Query Difficulty and Sample Complexity in Crowdsourced Data Acquisition","authors":"Hye Won Chung, J. Lee, Doyeon Kim, A. Hero","doi":"10.1109/ALLERTON.2018.8636012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consider a crowdsourcing system whose task is to classify $k$ objects in a database into two groups depending on the binary attributes of the objects. Here we propose a parity response model: the worker is asked to check whether the number of objects having a given attribute in the chosen subset is even or odd. A worker either responds with a correct binary answer or declines to respond. We propose a method for designing the sequence of subsets of objects to be queried so that the attributes of the objects can be identified with high probability using few (${n}$) answers. The method is based on an analogy to the design of Fountain codes for erasure channels. We define the query difficulty $\\overline {d}$ as the average size of the query subsets and we define the sample complexity $n$ as the minimum number of collected answers required to attain a given recovery accuracy. We obtain fundamental tradeoffs between recovery accuracy, query difficulty, and sample complexity. In particular, the necessary and sufficient sample complexity required for recovering all $k$ attributes with high probability is $n = c_{0}\\max\\{k, (k\\,\\log\\, k)/\\overline {d}\\}$ and the sample complexity for recovering a fixed proportion $(1-\\delta )k$ of the attributes for $\\delta =o(1)$ is $n=c_{1} \\max \\{k, (\\mathrm {k}\\log (1/\\delta ))/\\overline {d}\\}$, where $c_{0},\\, c_{1} >0.$","PeriodicalId":299280,"journal":{"name":"2018 56th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton)","volume":"121 43","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 56th Annual Allerton Conference on Communication, Control, and Computing (Allerton)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ALLERTON.2018.8636012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Consider a crowdsourcing system whose task is to classify $k$ objects in a database into two groups depending on the binary attributes of the objects. Here we propose a parity response model: the worker is asked to check whether the number of objects having a given attribute in the chosen subset is even or odd. A worker either responds with a correct binary answer or declines to respond. We propose a method for designing the sequence of subsets of objects to be queried so that the attributes of the objects can be identified with high probability using few (${n}$) answers. The method is based on an analogy to the design of Fountain codes for erasure channels. We define the query difficulty $\overline {d}$ as the average size of the query subsets and we define the sample complexity $n$ as the minimum number of collected answers required to attain a given recovery accuracy. We obtain fundamental tradeoffs between recovery accuracy, query difficulty, and sample complexity. In particular, the necessary and sufficient sample complexity required for recovering all $k$ attributes with high probability is $n = c_{0}\max\{k, (k\,\log\, k)/\overline {d}\}$ and the sample complexity for recovering a fixed proportion $(1-\delta )k$ of the attributes for $\delta =o(1)$ is $n=c_{1} \max \{k, (\mathrm {k}\log (1/\delta ))/\overline {d}\}$, where $c_{0},\, c_{1} >0.$
众包数据采集中查询难度和样本复杂度的权衡
考虑一个众包系统,其任务是根据对象的二进制属性将数据库中的$k$对象分为两组。在这里,我们提出了一个奇偶响应模型:工作器被要求检查所选子集中具有给定属性的对象的数量是偶数还是奇数。工作人员要么回答一个正确的二进制答案,要么拒绝回答。我们提出了一种设计要查询的对象子集序列的方法,以便使用较少的答案(${n}$)以高概率识别对象的属性。该方法是基于对擦除通道的喷泉代码设计的类比。我们将查询困难度$\overline {d}$定义为查询子集的平均大小,并将样本复杂度$n$定义为获得给定恢复精度所需的收集答案的最小数量。我们在恢复精度、查询难度和样本复杂性之间取得了基本的平衡。特别是,高概率恢复所有$k$属性所需的必要和足够的样本复杂度为$n = c_{0}\max\{k, (k\,\log\, k)/\overline {d}\}$,恢复$\delta =o(1)$属性的固定比例$(1-\delta )k$的样本复杂度为$n=c_{1} \max \{k, (\mathrm {k}\log (1/\delta ))/\overline {d}\}$,其中 $c_{0},\, c_{1} >0.$
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信