Memory and Imagination: Perspectives on Constructive Episodic Simulation

D. Schacter, D. Addis
{"title":"Memory and Imagination: Perspectives on Constructive Episodic Simulation","authors":"D. Schacter, D. Addis","doi":"10.1017/9781108580298.008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Questions concerning the relation between memory and imagination have occupied a prominent place in cognitive psychology and cognitive neuroscience during the past several decades. Johnson and Raye’s (1981) reality monitoring framework brought the issue into prominence by portraying the relation as constituting a fundamental problem that must be addressed by any cognitive model. Johnson and Raye’s framework provided the inspiration for subsequent cognitive and neuroimaging studies concerning the mnemonic qualities of perceived and imagined events, and the underlying psychological and neural processes that allow us to distinguish between them (for an update, see Simons, Garrison, and Johnson, 2017). A little more than a decade ago, a related line of research emerged that focused on striking neural and cognitive similarities that occur when people remember past experiences and imagine or simulate future and hypothetical experiences. The foundation of this work was set in the 1980s and 1990s by clinical observations that an amnesic patient with a severe deficit in recalling past experiences also had comparable difficulties imagining future experiences (Tulving, 1985; see also, Klein, Loftus, and Kihlstrom, 2002) and that suicidally depressed patients showed similar reductions in the specificity of autobiographical memories and future imaginings (Williams et al., 1996). Observations that remembering past experiences and imagining future experiences show similar neural correlates (Okuda et al., 2003), phenomenological characteristics (D’Argembeau and van der Linden, 2004) and individual differences (D’Argembeau and van der Linden, 2006) heightened interest in the relation between the two. This growing interest was galvanized by the publication in 2007 of several papers that strengthened the case for a link between remembering and imagining by revealing strong overlap in the brain regions engaged when people remembered past experiences and either imagined future experiences (Addis, Wong, and Schacter, 2007; Szpunar, Watson, and McDermott, 2007) or imagined novel scenes (i.e. scene construction: Hassabis, Kumaran, and Maguire, 2007a). This evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was complemented by neuropsychological evidence showing that several amnesic patients with medial temporal lobe damage exhibit scene construction deficits (Hassabis et al., 2007b). Based on these and related observations, Schacter, Addis, and Buckner (2007; see also, Buckner and Carroll, 2007) pointed to the existence of a core neural network,","PeriodicalId":408592,"journal":{"name":"The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"43","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Cambridge Handbook of the Imagination","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108580298.008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 43

Abstract

Questions concerning the relation between memory and imagination have occupied a prominent place in cognitive psychology and cognitive neuroscience during the past several decades. Johnson and Raye’s (1981) reality monitoring framework brought the issue into prominence by portraying the relation as constituting a fundamental problem that must be addressed by any cognitive model. Johnson and Raye’s framework provided the inspiration for subsequent cognitive and neuroimaging studies concerning the mnemonic qualities of perceived and imagined events, and the underlying psychological and neural processes that allow us to distinguish between them (for an update, see Simons, Garrison, and Johnson, 2017). A little more than a decade ago, a related line of research emerged that focused on striking neural and cognitive similarities that occur when people remember past experiences and imagine or simulate future and hypothetical experiences. The foundation of this work was set in the 1980s and 1990s by clinical observations that an amnesic patient with a severe deficit in recalling past experiences also had comparable difficulties imagining future experiences (Tulving, 1985; see also, Klein, Loftus, and Kihlstrom, 2002) and that suicidally depressed patients showed similar reductions in the specificity of autobiographical memories and future imaginings (Williams et al., 1996). Observations that remembering past experiences and imagining future experiences show similar neural correlates (Okuda et al., 2003), phenomenological characteristics (D’Argembeau and van der Linden, 2004) and individual differences (D’Argembeau and van der Linden, 2006) heightened interest in the relation between the two. This growing interest was galvanized by the publication in 2007 of several papers that strengthened the case for a link between remembering and imagining by revealing strong overlap in the brain regions engaged when people remembered past experiences and either imagined future experiences (Addis, Wong, and Schacter, 2007; Szpunar, Watson, and McDermott, 2007) or imagined novel scenes (i.e. scene construction: Hassabis, Kumaran, and Maguire, 2007a). This evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) was complemented by neuropsychological evidence showing that several amnesic patients with medial temporal lobe damage exhibit scene construction deficits (Hassabis et al., 2007b). Based on these and related observations, Schacter, Addis, and Buckner (2007; see also, Buckner and Carroll, 2007) pointed to the existence of a core neural network,
记忆和想象:建设性情景模拟的视角
在过去的几十年里,关于记忆和想象之间关系的问题在认知心理学和认知神经科学中占据了突出的地位。Johnson和Raye(1981)的现实监测框架将这种关系描绘成一个必须由任何认知模型解决的基本问题,从而使这个问题变得突出。Johnson和Raye的框架为随后的认知和神经成像研究提供了灵感,这些研究涉及感知和想象事件的助记特性,以及使我们能够区分它们的潜在心理和神经过程(有关更新,请参阅Simons, Garrison, and Johnson, 2017)。十多年前,出现了一项相关的研究,重点关注人们在回忆过去的经历、想象或模拟未来和假设的经历时出现的惊人的神经和认知相似性。这项工作的基础是在20世纪80年代和90年代的临床观察中建立的,一个在回忆过去经历方面严重缺陷的失忆症患者在想象未来经历方面也有类似的困难(Tulving, 1985;另见Klein, Loftus, and Kihlstrom, 2002),自杀抑郁症患者在自传体记忆和未来想象的特异性方面也表现出类似的降低(Williams et al., 1996)。对记忆过去经历和想象未来经历的观察显示出相似的神经关联(Okuda等人,2003年)、现象学特征(D’argemau和van der Linden, 2004年)和个体差异(D’argemau和van der Linden, 2006年),这增强了人们对两者之间关系的兴趣。2007年发表的几篇论文激发了人们对记忆和想象之间联系的兴趣,这些论文揭示了当人们回忆过去的经历和想象未来的经历时,大脑中参与的区域有很强的重叠(Addis, Wong, and Schacter, 2007;Szpunar, Watson, and McDermott, 2007)或想象的小说场景(即场景构建:Hassabis, Kumaran, and Maguire, 2007)。来自功能性磁共振成像(fMRI)的证据与神经心理学证据相补充,表明一些内侧颞叶损伤的失忆症患者表现出场景构建缺陷(Hassabis等,2007b)。基于这些和相关的观察,Schacter, Addis, and Buckner (2007;另见Buckner and Carroll, 2007)指出了核心神经网络的存在,
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信