Diana Vela-Almeida, A. Lyall, G. Lasso, Diego Andreucci
{"title":"Resisting austerity in the era of COVID-19","authors":"Diana Vela-Almeida, A. Lyall, G. Lasso, Diego Andreucci","doi":"10.4324/9781003036265-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A wave of right and far-right governments swept Latin America after a commodity ‘super cycle’ came to an end around 2014, seemingly marking the end of a decade characterised by progressive and leftist governments in the region. In the moment we finish writing this chapter, in early 2021, right-wing governments have been governing debt and fiscal crises through increasing foreign debt and imposing austerity measures, including cuts to social and environmental programs and the privatisation of state institutions. In effect, such measures have placed the cost of debt and fiscal deficits on the popular classes that most depend on government services. The turn towards austerity in Latin America has been compared to the 1980s and 1990s, when the original neoliberal project produced what are frequently called “the lost decades”, in reference to rising poverty and inequality in the region (Naranjo, 2004). The lost decades and the current conjuncture of the late 2010s have both been characterised by reductions in social spending and market deregulation, in addition to policies designed to secure capital accumulation, such as labour flexibilization and free trade agreements (FTAs) largely imposed by international money lenders. In response to a broad array of neoliberal reforms in the 1990s and early 2000s, multiple governments across the region were challenged or toppled by mass popular protests that converged on political centres. Likewise, massive street protests emerged in the final months of 2019 in a number of countries in the region, particularly in Ecuador, Chile, Colombia, and Haiti. Thus, 2019 ended amid growing popular discontent and mass social mobilization, characterized by growing articulations between diverse social movements. However, this mass mobilization was truncated by the COVID-19 public health crisis. Specifically in Ecuador, the central government took advantage of the public health crisis to advance austerity measures and further benefit capital through state deregulation and provision of financial incentives for environmentally destructive activities linked to extractive industries and the corporate food sector – a veritable economic-environmental “corona-shock” (c.f. De Fato, 2020). In Ecuador, resistance has not disappeared during the pandemic despite the absence of large mass uprisings. Rather, as we explore in this chapter, Resisting austerity in the era of COVID-19","PeriodicalId":216130,"journal":{"name":"The Political Ecology of Austerity","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Political Ecology of Austerity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003036265-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
A wave of right and far-right governments swept Latin America after a commodity ‘super cycle’ came to an end around 2014, seemingly marking the end of a decade characterised by progressive and leftist governments in the region. In the moment we finish writing this chapter, in early 2021, right-wing governments have been governing debt and fiscal crises through increasing foreign debt and imposing austerity measures, including cuts to social and environmental programs and the privatisation of state institutions. In effect, such measures have placed the cost of debt and fiscal deficits on the popular classes that most depend on government services. The turn towards austerity in Latin America has been compared to the 1980s and 1990s, when the original neoliberal project produced what are frequently called “the lost decades”, in reference to rising poverty and inequality in the region (Naranjo, 2004). The lost decades and the current conjuncture of the late 2010s have both been characterised by reductions in social spending and market deregulation, in addition to policies designed to secure capital accumulation, such as labour flexibilization and free trade agreements (FTAs) largely imposed by international money lenders. In response to a broad array of neoliberal reforms in the 1990s and early 2000s, multiple governments across the region were challenged or toppled by mass popular protests that converged on political centres. Likewise, massive street protests emerged in the final months of 2019 in a number of countries in the region, particularly in Ecuador, Chile, Colombia, and Haiti. Thus, 2019 ended amid growing popular discontent and mass social mobilization, characterized by growing articulations between diverse social movements. However, this mass mobilization was truncated by the COVID-19 public health crisis. Specifically in Ecuador, the central government took advantage of the public health crisis to advance austerity measures and further benefit capital through state deregulation and provision of financial incentives for environmentally destructive activities linked to extractive industries and the corporate food sector – a veritable economic-environmental “corona-shock” (c.f. De Fato, 2020). In Ecuador, resistance has not disappeared during the pandemic despite the absence of large mass uprisings. Rather, as we explore in this chapter, Resisting austerity in the era of COVID-19
2014年左右,大宗商品“超级周期”结束后,一波右翼和极右翼政府席卷拉丁美洲,似乎标志着该地区以进步和左翼政府为特征的十年的结束。在我们完成本章的那一刻,即2021年初,右翼政府一直在通过增加外债和实施紧缩措施(包括削减社会和环境项目以及国家机构私有化)来治理债务和财政危机。实际上,这些措施将债务和财政赤字的成本推给了最依赖政府服务的大众阶层。拉丁美洲向紧缩的转变被比作20世纪80年代和90年代,当时最初的新自由主义项目产生了经常被称为“失去的几十年”,指的是该地区日益严重的贫困和不平等(Naranjo, 2004)。“失去的几十年”和2010年代末当前的危机,都以社会支出减少和市场放松管制为特征,此外还有旨在确保资本积累的政策,如劳动力灵活性和主要由国际放债人实施的自由贸易协定(fta)。作为对20世纪90年代和21世纪初一系列广泛的新自由主义改革的回应,该地区的多个政府都受到了向政治中心聚集的大规模民众抗议活动的挑战或推翻。同样,2019年最后几个月,该地区一些国家,特别是厄瓜多尔、智利、哥伦比亚和海地,出现了大规模街头抗议活动。因此,2019年在民众不满和大规模社会动员中结束,其特点是各种社会运动之间的联系日益紧密。然而,这种大规模动员因COVID-19公共卫生危机而中断。特别是在厄瓜多尔,中央政府利用公共卫生危机推进紧缩措施,并通过国家放松管制和为与采掘业和企业食品部门有关的破坏环境的活动提供财政激励,进一步使资本受益——这是名副其实的经济-环境“冠状冲击”(c.f De Fato, 2020年)。在厄瓜多尔,尽管没有大规模的群众起义,但在大流行期间,耐药性并未消失。相反,正如我们在本章探讨的那样,在COVID-19时代抵制紧缩