Maturity Level of the Quality Assurance Evaluation Procedures in Higher Education: A qualitative research

Manolis Chalaris, Ioannis Chalaris, S. Gritzalis, C. Sgouropoulou
{"title":"Maturity Level of the Quality Assurance Evaluation Procedures in Higher Education: A qualitative research","authors":"Manolis Chalaris, Ioannis Chalaris, S. Gritzalis, C. Sgouropoulou","doi":"10.1145/3139367.3139438","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The establishment of mature operational procedures to support the educational process and the attempt to standardize and certificate these procedures is a very arduous and a demanding task that requires ensuring conditions in several levels of government. At the same time, according to the latest requirements of HQAA (Hellenic Quality Assurance & Accreditation Agency) regarding the certification of study programs and the gradual establishment of quality assurance mechanisms, it is a necessity for all educational institutions to establish such operational procedures. Standardization of procedures and effective change management are the critical issues. In this work we measured the maturity level of the current evaluation processes in an advanced academic department of a HEI (Higher Education Institute) as well as of the new procedures proposed by HQAA for the Certification of Curricula and of the establishment of a Quality Assurance System (QAS). Based on the results of our research it is possible to draw conclusions about the feasibility of implementing the new required procedures and the degree of difficulty of their application and exploitation. At the same time, an assessment of the level of process maturity in the academic department is possible, using Capability Maturity Models. At the end of this work we present a road map for the development of a QAS for a HEI.","PeriodicalId":436862,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 21st Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-09-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 21st Pan-Hellenic Conference on Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3139367.3139438","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The establishment of mature operational procedures to support the educational process and the attempt to standardize and certificate these procedures is a very arduous and a demanding task that requires ensuring conditions in several levels of government. At the same time, according to the latest requirements of HQAA (Hellenic Quality Assurance & Accreditation Agency) regarding the certification of study programs and the gradual establishment of quality assurance mechanisms, it is a necessity for all educational institutions to establish such operational procedures. Standardization of procedures and effective change management are the critical issues. In this work we measured the maturity level of the current evaluation processes in an advanced academic department of a HEI (Higher Education Institute) as well as of the new procedures proposed by HQAA for the Certification of Curricula and of the establishment of a Quality Assurance System (QAS). Based on the results of our research it is possible to draw conclusions about the feasibility of implementing the new required procedures and the degree of difficulty of their application and exploitation. At the same time, an assessment of the level of process maturity in the academic department is possible, using Capability Maturity Models. At the end of this work we present a road map for the development of a QAS for a HEI.
高等教育质量保证评价程序成熟度的定性研究
建立成熟的业务程序以支持教育进程,并试图使这些程序标准化和证明是一项非常艰巨和艰巨的任务,需要确保各级政府的条件。同时,根据HQAA(希腊质量保证与认可机构)对学习项目认证的最新要求和质量保证机制的逐步建立,所有教育机构都有必要建立这样的操作程序。程序的标准化和有效的变更管理是关键问题。在这项工作中,我们测量了一所高等教育学院的高级学术部门目前的评估程序的成熟度,以及HQAA建议的课程认证和建立质量保证体系(QAS)的新程序。根据我们的研究结果,可以得出实施新要求程序的可行性及其应用和开发的困难程度的结论。同时,利用能力成熟度模型对学术部门的过程成熟度水平进行评估是可能的。在这项工作的最后,我们为高等教育机构的质量评价体系的发展提出了路线图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信