Using Shared Inquiry to Develop Students' Reading, Reasoning, and Writing in the Disciplines

Sandra Egege, K. Vered
{"title":"Using Shared Inquiry to Develop Students' Reading, Reasoning, and Writing in the Disciplines","authors":"Sandra Egege, K. Vered","doi":"10.37514/ATD-J.2019.16.3.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is commonly accepted in the academy that developing a critical thinking capacity and related capabilities will make students more effective thinkers and writers, and that these are desirable traits for graduates to have no matter what path they take after graduation. While most academics agree that critical thinking is an essential component of university education, they are less clear about what constitutes critical thinking and how it is, or can be, incorporated within their own teaching and assessment practices without displacing disciplinary content (Moore, 2011). This article discusses how the Shared Inquiry (SI) discussion method can be deployed to teach disciplinary content and critical thinking simultaneously. Qualitative evidence from the method’s application in a Screen & Media Studies subject taught at Flinders University, South Australia, is presented to demonstrate the benefits of SI in developing critical thinking among undergraduate student cohorts.","PeriodicalId":201634,"journal":{"name":"Across the Disciplines","volume":"96 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Across the Disciplines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37514/ATD-J.2019.16.3.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

It is commonly accepted in the academy that developing a critical thinking capacity and related capabilities will make students more effective thinkers and writers, and that these are desirable traits for graduates to have no matter what path they take after graduation. While most academics agree that critical thinking is an essential component of university education, they are less clear about what constitutes critical thinking and how it is, or can be, incorporated within their own teaching and assessment practices without displacing disciplinary content (Moore, 2011). This article discusses how the Shared Inquiry (SI) discussion method can be deployed to teach disciplinary content and critical thinking simultaneously. Qualitative evidence from the method’s application in a Screen & Media Studies subject taught at Flinders University, South Australia, is presented to demonstrate the benefits of SI in developing critical thinking among undergraduate student cohorts.
利用共享探究培养学生的阅读、推理和写作能力
学术界普遍认为,培养批判性思维能力和相关能力将使学生成为更有效的思考者和作家,这些都是毕业生在毕业后无论选择何种道路都需要具备的品质。虽然大多数学者都认为批判性思维是大学教育的重要组成部分,但他们不太清楚什么是批判性思维,以及如何将其纳入自己的教学和评估实践,而不会取代学科内容(Moore, 2011)。本文讨论了如何利用共享探究(SI)讨论方法同时教授学科内容和批判性思维。该方法在南澳大利亚弗林德斯大学教授的屏幕与媒体研究学科中的应用提供了定性证据,以证明科学探究在培养本科生群体的批判性思维方面的好处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信