Comparison of the Effectiveness of Biomedical Subject Learning Methods

Syokumawena, Herawati Jaya
{"title":"Comparison of the Effectiveness of Biomedical Subject Learning Methods","authors":"Syokumawena, Herawati Jaya","doi":"10.56988/chiprof.v1i2.9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Covid-19 outbreak requires the teaching and learning process to change to using online methods. The purpose of this study was to determine the evaluation of student learning in basic biomedical science courses consisting of theory and practicum with offline and online methods by looking at the scores of students' final semester exam results.The sample for this assessment is 174. The value of offline theory compared to online differs by 4.94 points, where the online value is high. The value of online practicum learning compared to offline is 8.2 points different, where the online value is also higher. Final semester test scoresmethod theoryoffline varies from 43 – 88 whilemethodonline from the value of 52 – 92. The results of the final semester practicum exam scoresmethodoffline from 68 - 90 while online ranging from 60 - 98. The average percentage of online theory learning methods is 74.15andthe average offline theory learning method is 69.21. Meanwhile, the average percentage of offline practicum learning methods is 74.59 and the average percentage of online practicum learning methods is 82.79. The analysis of this research uses the SPSS program independent samples t-test with the results of the value of️= 4.818and siq of 0.013 (less than 0.05), then the conclusion is the result of the value of basic biomedical science with online learning methods is higher than offline learning.","PeriodicalId":113040,"journal":{"name":"International Journal Scientific and Professional (IJ-ChiProf)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal Scientific and Professional (IJ-ChiProf)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56988/chiprof.v1i2.9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Covid-19 outbreak requires the teaching and learning process to change to using online methods. The purpose of this study was to determine the evaluation of student learning in basic biomedical science courses consisting of theory and practicum with offline and online methods by looking at the scores of students' final semester exam results.The sample for this assessment is 174. The value of offline theory compared to online differs by 4.94 points, where the online value is high. The value of online practicum learning compared to offline is 8.2 points different, where the online value is also higher. Final semester test scoresmethod theoryoffline varies from 43 – 88 whilemethodonline from the value of 52 – 92. The results of the final semester practicum exam scoresmethodoffline from 68 - 90 while online ranging from 60 - 98. The average percentage of online theory learning methods is 74.15andthe average offline theory learning method is 69.21. Meanwhile, the average percentage of offline practicum learning methods is 74.59 and the average percentage of online practicum learning methods is 82.79. The analysis of this research uses the SPSS program independent samples t-test with the results of the value of️= 4.818and siq of 0.013 (less than 0.05), then the conclusion is the result of the value of basic biomedical science with online learning methods is higher than offline learning.
生物医学学科学习方法的有效性比较
新冠肺炎疫情要求教学过程转变为使用在线方法。本研究的目的是通过观察学生期末考试成绩,确定对学生在生物医学基础课程中理论与实践学习的评价。这个评估的样本是174。与线上理论相比,线下理论的价值相差4.94分,线上理论的价值较高。在线实习学习的价值与线下相差8.2分,线上的价值也更高。期末考试成绩(method theoryoffline)从43 - 88不等,而methodonline从52 - 92不等。期末实习考试的线下成绩在68 - 90分之间,线上成绩在60 - 98分之间。在线理论学习方法的平均百分比为74.15%,离线理论学习方法的平均百分比为69.21%。同时,线下实习学习方式的平均百分比为74.59%,线上实习学习方式的平均百分比为82.79%。本研究的分析采用SPSS程序独立样本t检验,结果值️= 4.818,siq为0.013(小于0.05),则结论为基础生物医学采用在线学习方法的价值高于离线学习的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信