Testing the Fidelity of an Emulab Testbed

A. Perez-Garcia, C. Siaterlis, M. Masera
{"title":"Testing the Fidelity of an Emulab Testbed","authors":"A. Perez-Garcia, C. Siaterlis, M. Masera","doi":"10.1109/ICDCSW.2010.74","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Studying the resilience of complex systems and Critical Infrastructures (CI), e.g., the Internet, in order to improve protection and response mechanisms is an important research activity due to their vital role in modern economy and society. Such studies are frequently based on experimentation using a) real systems, b) software simulation or c) hardware emulation. In this paper we present how our emulation testbed, based on Emulab, is able to realistically reproduce real system configurations (fidelity or system representativeness). We compare experimental results between two different emulation configurations against a reference configuration without use of emulation (real). Our results lead to two main contributions. First, we confirm that the current trend of using emulation testbeds is justified as both realistic and efficient. We highlight the fact that Emulab-based configurations are representative of real systems in terms of emerging behavior (qualitative) and that the interpretation of experimental results should not be based on absolute numbers, e.g., performance metrics, because exact values are highly hardware dependent. Secondly, we indicate that users of Emulab-based testbeds should favor the ”delay-nodeshaping” rather than the ”end-node-shaping” strategy because it frequently leads to more consistent results.","PeriodicalId":133907,"journal":{"name":"2010 IEEE 30th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops","volume":"101 8","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2010 IEEE 30th International Conference on Distributed Computing Systems Workshops","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICDCSW.2010.74","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

Studying the resilience of complex systems and Critical Infrastructures (CI), e.g., the Internet, in order to improve protection and response mechanisms is an important research activity due to their vital role in modern economy and society. Such studies are frequently based on experimentation using a) real systems, b) software simulation or c) hardware emulation. In this paper we present how our emulation testbed, based on Emulab, is able to realistically reproduce real system configurations (fidelity or system representativeness). We compare experimental results between two different emulation configurations against a reference configuration without use of emulation (real). Our results lead to two main contributions. First, we confirm that the current trend of using emulation testbeds is justified as both realistic and efficient. We highlight the fact that Emulab-based configurations are representative of real systems in terms of emerging behavior (qualitative) and that the interpretation of experimental results should not be based on absolute numbers, e.g., performance metrics, because exact values are highly hardware dependent. Secondly, we indicate that users of Emulab-based testbeds should favor the ”delay-nodeshaping” rather than the ”end-node-shaping” strategy because it frequently leads to more consistent results.
测试仿真测试平台的保真度
由于复杂系统和关键基础设施(如互联网)在现代经济和社会中的重要作用,研究其弹性以改善保护和响应机制是一项重要的研究活动。这类研究通常基于a)真实系统的实验,b)软件仿真或c)硬件仿真。在本文中,我们展示了基于Emulab的仿真试验台如何能够真实地再现真实的系统配置(保真度或系统代表性)。我们将两种不同的仿真配置与不使用仿真(真实)的参考配置之间的实验结果进行比较。我们的研究结果有两个主要贡献。首先,我们证实了目前使用仿真试验台的趋势是合理的,既现实又有效。我们强调的事实是,基于emulab的配置在新兴行为(定性)方面代表了真实系统,并且实验结果的解释不应该基于绝对数字,例如性能指标,因为精确值高度依赖于硬件。其次,我们指出,基于emulab的测试平台的用户应该倾向于“延迟节点整形”而不是“终端节点整形”策略,因为它经常导致更一致的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信