Smart Heritage: an easy method for matching colors

Carolina Vatteroni
{"title":"Smart Heritage: an easy method for matching colors","authors":"Carolina Vatteroni","doi":"10.4995/rech6.2021.13502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Historic buildings and architectural surfaces are a significant part of the European heritage.In the field of preservation and conservation of historic facades – especially for those of buildings that are still in use - restorers frequently face the task of faithfully repurpose from a chromatic point of view surfaces and paintings, often having small patches of original color as the only reference.This step is often carried out by visual assessment by a restorer proficient in the field of colorant formulation and with in-depth knowledge of the behavior of colorants in a specific material: the process involves making a series of samples that are tested on the surface to be treated, in order to identify the most suitable.Nevertheless, such a procedure is strictly related to the sensitivity of the conservator.The series of samples produced can easily be subject to phenomena of observer metamerism and conditional match: in fact, it is possible that a set of samples that appear to match under a defined set of viewing conditions, such as light source or viewing angle, no longer match if those conditions change.Since restoration is first and foremost a science, the restorer is provided by the market with effective and specific color measurement devices that are able to capture, measure and quantify the color of a surface, providing reliable data: -in order of increasing sophistication- densitometers, colorimeters and spectrophotometers.Unfortunately, on a restoration site and scaffolding the restorer does not always have the opportunity to use such sophisticated field-portable: as such equipment is often designed for other purposes, its use in built heritage conservation usually necessitates testing and careful calibration on order to ensure accurate data.Compromises must be made: the aim of this paper is to identify an intermediate solution, which would be more effective than visual assessment, easy to perform, and significantly less expensive than portable spectrophotometers.How this will be achieved? The tool I tested for this purpose is X-Rite's Color Checker, a target specifically designed for photography and video production that is able to compare, measure and analyze differences in color reproduction in any color rendition system.I used the Color Checker target and software to compare original paintings with samples reproduced by visual assessment, in order to verify their spectral match, which means the two colors have the same color coordinates and appear identical regardless of illuminant or observer.Then, I tested my data by comparing them with those obtained by specifically designed equipment.The results show that this method is able to provide relevant information on color matching, it is quick and easy to perform and definitely affordable, and it could represent a smart alternative for built heritage conservation.  ","PeriodicalId":115079,"journal":{"name":"6th International Meeting on Retouching of Cultural Heritage. RECH6","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"6th International Meeting on Retouching of Cultural Heritage. RECH6","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4995/rech6.2021.13502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Historic buildings and architectural surfaces are a significant part of the European heritage.In the field of preservation and conservation of historic facades – especially for those of buildings that are still in use - restorers frequently face the task of faithfully repurpose from a chromatic point of view surfaces and paintings, often having small patches of original color as the only reference.This step is often carried out by visual assessment by a restorer proficient in the field of colorant formulation and with in-depth knowledge of the behavior of colorants in a specific material: the process involves making a series of samples that are tested on the surface to be treated, in order to identify the most suitable.Nevertheless, such a procedure is strictly related to the sensitivity of the conservator.The series of samples produced can easily be subject to phenomena of observer metamerism and conditional match: in fact, it is possible that a set of samples that appear to match under a defined set of viewing conditions, such as light source or viewing angle, no longer match if those conditions change.Since restoration is first and foremost a science, the restorer is provided by the market with effective and specific color measurement devices that are able to capture, measure and quantify the color of a surface, providing reliable data: -in order of increasing sophistication- densitometers, colorimeters and spectrophotometers.Unfortunately, on a restoration site and scaffolding the restorer does not always have the opportunity to use such sophisticated field-portable: as such equipment is often designed for other purposes, its use in built heritage conservation usually necessitates testing and careful calibration on order to ensure accurate data.Compromises must be made: the aim of this paper is to identify an intermediate solution, which would be more effective than visual assessment, easy to perform, and significantly less expensive than portable spectrophotometers.How this will be achieved? The tool I tested for this purpose is X-Rite's Color Checker, a target specifically designed for photography and video production that is able to compare, measure and analyze differences in color reproduction in any color rendition system.I used the Color Checker target and software to compare original paintings with samples reproduced by visual assessment, in order to verify their spectral match, which means the two colors have the same color coordinates and appear identical regardless of illuminant or observer.Then, I tested my data by comparing them with those obtained by specifically designed equipment.The results show that this method is able to provide relevant information on color matching, it is quick and easy to perform and definitely affordable, and it could represent a smart alternative for built heritage conservation.  
Smart Heritage:一种简单的配色方法
历史建筑和建筑表面是欧洲遗产的重要组成部分。在保存和保护历史立面的领域,特别是对于那些仍在使用的建筑物,修复者经常面临着从色彩角度忠实地重新利用表面和绘画的任务,通常只有小块的原始颜色作为唯一参考。这一步通常由精通着色剂配方领域的修复人员进行视觉评估,并深入了解着色剂在特定材料中的行为:该过程涉及制作一系列样品,并在待处理的表面上进行测试,以确定最合适的。然而,这种程序严格地与保存者的敏感性有关。产生的一系列样品很容易受到观察者异谱现象和条件匹配的影响:事实上,在一组定义的观察条件下(如光源或观察角度)看起来匹配的一组样品,如果这些条件发生变化,就可能不再匹配。由于修复首先是一门科学,市场为修复者提供了有效和特定的颜色测量设备,这些设备能够捕获,测量和量化表面的颜色,提供可靠的数据:按照越来越复杂的顺序-密度计,色度计和分光光度计。不幸的是,在修复现场和脚手架上,修复者并不总是有机会使用这种复杂的现场便携式设备:由于这种设备通常是为其他目的而设计的,因此在建筑遗产保护中使用它通常需要进行测试和仔细校准,以确保数据准确。必须做出妥协:本文的目的是确定一种中间溶液,它将比视觉评估更有效,易于执行,并且比便携式分光光度计便宜得多。这将如何实现?我为此测试的工具是X-Rite的Color Checker,这是一个专门为摄影和视频制作设计的工具,能够比较、测量和分析任何色彩再现系统中色彩再现的差异。我使用Color Checker目标和软件将原画与视觉评估再现的样品进行对比,以验证它们的光谱匹配,即两种颜色具有相同的颜色坐标,无论光源还是观察者都是相同的。然后,我通过将我的数据与专门设计的设备得到的数据进行比较来测试我的数据。结果表明,该方法能够提供色彩匹配的相关信息,操作简单快捷,价格合理,是建筑遗产保护的一种明智选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信