{"title":"Conrad's Fatherless Sons: Betrayal by Paternity and Failure of Fraternity in under Western Eyes","authors":"C. Kaplan","doi":"10.1163/9789401207270_008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"THE TRAUMATIC ABSENCE or betrayal of the father is a key theme in Conrad's works, from Almayer's Polly (1895) onwards. Eord Jim, for example, presents an array of unsatisfactory fathers - Jim's naive, hypocritical parson father; Stein, whose romantic injunctions prove unequal to salvaging Jim; and Doramin, who relinquishes to Jim his own son's right to succession. But in no work does Conrad explore this theme more fully than in Under Western Eyes, in which all fathers - biological, social, and political - fail or betray their sons. Razumov's father, who refuses to acknowledge his natural son, is cowardly and unable to protect him. Haldin's father is dead - and his death has undone his family. Further, father figures in Russia, including General T- and Mikulin, are either cruel or untrustworthy; and father figures in the West, whether the actual Teacher of Languages or the spectrally present Jean-Jacques Rousseau, are either ineffectual or misguided. Finally, the State as father is either cruelly autocratic, as is Russia; or complacently materialistic, as is Switzerland.Given the failure of patriarchy and patriarchal institutions, the novel considers the possibility of an alternative order, a society of brothers, as first proposed by Haldin to Razumov. But the novel, as it unfolds, demonstrates that such an alternative structure is doomed to fail. In the absence of the father, there can be no brotherhood: the sons - Razumov, Peter Ivanovitch, Yakovlitch - do not share power but rather bicker, batde, and flounder. And the sisters - Natalia, Tekla, and Sophia Antonovna - lacking any place in society, create their own, but at the expense of procreation and social continuity. The collapse of generations results in the loss of generativity: paralyzed men and disaffected women do not marry nor have children. That Conrad, in the course of writing the novel, came to the above awareness is demonstrated by his rejection of the original marriage plot.In a 1908 letter to John Galsworthy, Conrad explains his first conception of the novel: \"The Student Razumov meeting abroad the mother and sister of Haldin falls in love with that last, marries her and after a time confesses to her the part he played in the arrest and death of her brother\" (CL4 9). In rethinking the thematic elements, Conrad moved away from the earlier version, in which Razumov and Natalia marry, to the final version in which Razumov's confession leads to Natalia's rejection and his destruction.Yet, on closer examination, Under Western Eyes is not about the failures of patriarchy and patriarchal institutions. For indeed in the Russia Conrad depicts there is no patriarchy. Patriarchy implies law and social order. But, as Conrad points out in his 1905 essay \"Autocracy and War,\" \"there never has been any legality in Russia\" (Notes on Life and Letters 84): \"From the very first ghasdy dawn of her existence as a state she had to breathe the atmosphere of despotism, she found nothing but the arbitrary will of an obscure autocrat at the beginning and end of her organisation\" (82). An obscure autocrat\" with \"an arbitrary will\" is the antithesis of the law-giving and law-enforcing father of patriarchy, who acknowledges his children, directs their course, imposes obligations, confers privileges, and assures their future.\"Autocracy and War\" proceeds to expatiate on the hopelessness of human lives lived in the shadow of Russian autocracy:Russia . . . has not the right to give her voice in a single question touching the future of humanity, because from the very inception of her being the brutal destruction of dignity, of truth, of rectitude, of all that is faithful in human nature has been made the imperative condition of her existence. The great governmental secret of that Imperium ... has been the extirpation of every intellectual hope. (82-83)Unsurprisingly, Under Western Eyes, the novel about Russia that Conrad published five years later, embodies these bleak pronouncements in the lives of his Russian characters. …","PeriodicalId":394409,"journal":{"name":"The Conradian : the Journal of the Joseph Conrad Society","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2011-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Conradian : the Journal of the Joseph Conrad Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789401207270_008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
THE TRAUMATIC ABSENCE or betrayal of the father is a key theme in Conrad's works, from Almayer's Polly (1895) onwards. Eord Jim, for example, presents an array of unsatisfactory fathers - Jim's naive, hypocritical parson father; Stein, whose romantic injunctions prove unequal to salvaging Jim; and Doramin, who relinquishes to Jim his own son's right to succession. But in no work does Conrad explore this theme more fully than in Under Western Eyes, in which all fathers - biological, social, and political - fail or betray their sons. Razumov's father, who refuses to acknowledge his natural son, is cowardly and unable to protect him. Haldin's father is dead - and his death has undone his family. Further, father figures in Russia, including General T- and Mikulin, are either cruel or untrustworthy; and father figures in the West, whether the actual Teacher of Languages or the spectrally present Jean-Jacques Rousseau, are either ineffectual or misguided. Finally, the State as father is either cruelly autocratic, as is Russia; or complacently materialistic, as is Switzerland.Given the failure of patriarchy and patriarchal institutions, the novel considers the possibility of an alternative order, a society of brothers, as first proposed by Haldin to Razumov. But the novel, as it unfolds, demonstrates that such an alternative structure is doomed to fail. In the absence of the father, there can be no brotherhood: the sons - Razumov, Peter Ivanovitch, Yakovlitch - do not share power but rather bicker, batde, and flounder. And the sisters - Natalia, Tekla, and Sophia Antonovna - lacking any place in society, create their own, but at the expense of procreation and social continuity. The collapse of generations results in the loss of generativity: paralyzed men and disaffected women do not marry nor have children. That Conrad, in the course of writing the novel, came to the above awareness is demonstrated by his rejection of the original marriage plot.In a 1908 letter to John Galsworthy, Conrad explains his first conception of the novel: "The Student Razumov meeting abroad the mother and sister of Haldin falls in love with that last, marries her and after a time confesses to her the part he played in the arrest and death of her brother" (CL4 9). In rethinking the thematic elements, Conrad moved away from the earlier version, in which Razumov and Natalia marry, to the final version in which Razumov's confession leads to Natalia's rejection and his destruction.Yet, on closer examination, Under Western Eyes is not about the failures of patriarchy and patriarchal institutions. For indeed in the Russia Conrad depicts there is no patriarchy. Patriarchy implies law and social order. But, as Conrad points out in his 1905 essay "Autocracy and War," "there never has been any legality in Russia" (Notes on Life and Letters 84): "From the very first ghasdy dawn of her existence as a state she had to breathe the atmosphere of despotism, she found nothing but the arbitrary will of an obscure autocrat at the beginning and end of her organisation" (82). An obscure autocrat" with "an arbitrary will" is the antithesis of the law-giving and law-enforcing father of patriarchy, who acknowledges his children, directs their course, imposes obligations, confers privileges, and assures their future."Autocracy and War" proceeds to expatiate on the hopelessness of human lives lived in the shadow of Russian autocracy:Russia . . . has not the right to give her voice in a single question touching the future of humanity, because from the very inception of her being the brutal destruction of dignity, of truth, of rectitude, of all that is faithful in human nature has been made the imperative condition of her existence. The great governmental secret of that Imperium ... has been the extirpation of every intellectual hope. (82-83)Unsurprisingly, Under Western Eyes, the novel about Russia that Conrad published five years later, embodies these bleak pronouncements in the lives of his Russian characters. …
从阿尔迈耶的《波莉》(1895)开始,父亲的创伤性缺失或背叛一直是康拉德作品的关键主题。例如,《吉姆勋爵》就展示了一系列令人不满意的父亲——吉姆天真、虚伪的牧师父亲;斯泰因,他浪漫的禁令不足以拯救吉姆;多拉明把自己儿子的继承权让给了吉姆。但在康拉德的作品中,没有比《西方人的眼睛》更充分地探讨了这个主题,在这本书中,所有的父亲——亲生的、社会的和政治的——都失败或背叛了他们的儿子。拉祖莫夫的父亲拒绝承认自己的亲生儿子,懦弱而无力保护他。霍尔丁的父亲去世了——他的死毁掉了他的家庭。此外,俄罗斯的父亲形象,包括T将军和米库林,要么残忍,要么不值得信任;以及西方的父亲形象,无论是真正的语言教师还是幽灵般的让-雅克·卢梭,要么是无效的,要么是被误导的。最后,作为父亲的国家要么是残酷的专制,就像俄国一样;或者自满地追求物质,就像瑞士一样。鉴于父权制和父权制度的失败,小说考虑了另一种秩序的可能性,即兄弟社会,正如哈尔丁首先向拉祖莫夫提出的那样。但随着故事的展开,这部小说表明,这样一种替代结构注定要失败。没有父亲,就没有兄弟情谊:儿子们——拉祖莫夫、彼得·伊万诺维奇、雅可夫利奇——不分享权力,而是斗嘴、打架、争斗。这对姐妹——纳塔莉亚、特克拉和索菲亚·安东诺夫娜——在社会上没有任何地位,她们创造了自己的家庭,但牺牲了生育和社会的连续性。代际的崩溃导致了生育能力的丧失:瘫痪的男性和心怀不满的女性不结婚也不生孩子。康拉德在小说创作过程中,对原著婚姻情节的拒斥,体现了他的上述意识。在1908年写给约翰·高尔斯华绥的信中,康拉德解释了他对这部小说的最初构想:“学生拉祖莫夫在国外遇见了哈尔丁的母亲和妹妹,爱上了她,娶了她,并在一段时间后向她坦白了他在她哥哥被捕和死亡中所扮演的角色”(CL4 9)。在重新思考主题元素时,康拉德从拉祖莫夫和纳塔莉亚结婚的早期版本转向了拉祖莫夫的忏悔导致纳塔莉亚的拒绝和他的毁灭的最终版本。然而,仔细研究一下,《西方人的眼睛》并不是关于父权制和父权制度的失败。因为在康拉德描绘的俄罗斯,确实没有父权制。父权制意味着法律和社会秩序。但是,正如康拉德在他1905年的文章《专制与战争》中指出的那样,“俄国从来就没有任何合法性”(《生活与书信笔记》,第84页):“从她作为一个国家存在的第一个阴森的黎明开始,她就不得不呼吸专制的气氛,在她的组织的开始和结束时,她只发现了一个不起眼的独裁者的武断意志”(82页)。一个有着“专断意志”的不为人知的“独裁者”与父权制的制定法律和执行法律的父亲是对立的,父权制承认他的孩子,指导他们的道路,强加义务,授予特权,并确保他们的未来。《专制与战争》接着阐述了生活在俄国专制阴影下的人类生活的绝望:俄国……难道她就没有权利在一个有关人类未来的问题上发表自己的意见吗?因为从她诞生的那一刻起,残酷地毁灭尊严、真理、正直以及人性中一切忠实的东西就成了她生存的必要条件。那个帝国伟大的政府秘密……已经消灭了所有知识分子的希望。(82-83)不出所料,康拉德五年后出版的关于俄罗斯的小说《在西方人的眼睛下》(Under Western Eyes)在他笔下的俄罗斯人物的生活中体现了这些黯淡的宣言。…