Lifestyle Recommendations for Hypertension through Rasch-based Feasibility Modeling

M. Radha, M. Willemsen, M. Boerhof, W. Ijsselsteijn
{"title":"Lifestyle Recommendations for Hypertension through Rasch-based Feasibility Modeling","authors":"M. Radha, M. Willemsen, M. Boerhof, W. Ijsselsteijn","doi":"10.1145/2930238.2930251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this work we investigate the use of behavior feasibility to adapt and personalize lifestyle-targeting recommender systems for the prevention and treatment of hypertension. Based on survey data (N=300) we model the feasibiliy of 63 behaviors through a Rasch model, describing the engagement in a behavior as a function of the behavior's difficulty and the person's ability. We formulate two feasibility-tailored recommendation strategies that utilize the Rasch model. The engagement maximization strategy aims at maximizing the probability of engagement by proposing very feasible behaviors while the motivation maximization strategy aims to challenge users by matching the difficulty of the advice with the ability of the user, thereby maximizing motivation. In an online study (N=150) we assessed user preference for either strategies (embodied as virtual coaches) in comparison with a random control strategy. Our results show that coaches selecting feasible health advice resonate better with the patient than control. In general patients significantly preferred the engagement maximization strategy over random advice on most factors, while patients with a medium level of ability significantly preferred the motivation maximization strategy on all factors.","PeriodicalId":339100,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization","volume":"239 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"24","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 2016 Conference on User Modeling Adaptation and Personalization","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2930238.2930251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 24

Abstract

In this work we investigate the use of behavior feasibility to adapt and personalize lifestyle-targeting recommender systems for the prevention and treatment of hypertension. Based on survey data (N=300) we model the feasibiliy of 63 behaviors through a Rasch model, describing the engagement in a behavior as a function of the behavior's difficulty and the person's ability. We formulate two feasibility-tailored recommendation strategies that utilize the Rasch model. The engagement maximization strategy aims at maximizing the probability of engagement by proposing very feasible behaviors while the motivation maximization strategy aims to challenge users by matching the difficulty of the advice with the ability of the user, thereby maximizing motivation. In an online study (N=150) we assessed user preference for either strategies (embodied as virtual coaches) in comparison with a random control strategy. Our results show that coaches selecting feasible health advice resonate better with the patient than control. In general patients significantly preferred the engagement maximization strategy over random advice on most factors, while patients with a medium level of ability significantly preferred the motivation maximization strategy on all factors.
基于rasch可行性模型的高血压生活方式建议
在这项工作中,我们研究了使用行为可行性来适应和个性化的生活方式推荐系统,以预防和治疗高血压。基于调查数据(N=300),我们通过Rasch模型对63种行为的可行性进行建模,该模型将行为的参与度描述为行为难度和个人能力的函数。我们利用Rasch模型制定了两种可行性定制的推荐策略。参与最大化策略旨在通过提出非常可行的行为来最大化参与的概率,而动机最大化策略旨在通过将建议的难度与用户的能力相匹配来挑战用户,从而最大化动机。在一项在线研究(N=150)中,我们评估了用户对两种策略(体现为虚拟教练)的偏好,并与随机控制策略进行了比较。我们的研究结果表明,教练选择可行的健康建议比对照组更能引起患者的共鸣。总的来说,在大多数因素上,患者显著倾向于参与最大化策略而不是随机建议,而中等能力水平的患者在所有因素上显著倾向于动机最大化策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信