Evaluation of Relationship Between Mandibular Third Molars and Mandibular Canal: Comparison of Findings Obtained by Panoramic Radiography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

Hilal Peker Öztürk, Hatice Seda Özgedik, İsmail Hakan Avsever, Savaş Özarslantürk, Merdan Allaberdiyev
{"title":"Evaluation of Relationship Between Mandibular Third Molars and Mandibular Canal: Comparison of Findings Obtained by Panoramic Radiography and Cone-Beam Computed Tomography","authors":"Hilal Peker Öztürk, Hatice Seda Özgedik, İsmail Hakan Avsever, Savaş Özarslantürk, Merdan Allaberdiyev","doi":"10.54995/asc.3.1.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Statement of the problem: It is important for oral surgeons to deter-mine the precise location of mandibular third molar before extraction. The close relationship of mandibular canal and mandibular third molar is a risk factor for alveolar nerve damage.\n\nObjective: The purpose of this study is to assess the relationship between mandibular canal and the mandibular third molar which has alre-ady been seen in close relationship on panoramic radiograph (PR) by the comparison of findings of the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and the PR.\n\nMaterials & Methods: Close relationship between the mandibular third molar and mandibular canal was scanned in 180 patients by the PR. Images were also obtained by CBCT from patients among which a close-relationship was detected between mandibular canal and mandibular third molar.\n\nResults: Close relationship was detected between mandibular third molar and mandibular canal on 26 of 180 PR and evaluated 46 mandibular third molars. In 41 cases, both the findings in PR and in CBCT images showed compliance with each other. As a result it was clearly seen that the mandibular third molars which were detected to be in close relationship on PR were mostly also in close relationship with mandibular canal on CBCT-images.\n\nConclusions: If the close relationship is not seen on the panoramic images then there is no need to get CBCT for extracting the mandibular third molars. By this way complication risks are eliminated with less radia-tion. However CBCT should be definitely used in cases which complete as-sessment cannot be made in no way due to artifacts such as superposition in PR.\n","PeriodicalId":355146,"journal":{"name":"Kapadokya Üniversitesi","volume":"38 4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kapadokya Üniversitesi","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54995/asc.3.1.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Statement of the problem: It is important for oral surgeons to deter-mine the precise location of mandibular third molar before extraction. The close relationship of mandibular canal and mandibular third molar is a risk factor for alveolar nerve damage. Objective: The purpose of this study is to assess the relationship between mandibular canal and the mandibular third molar which has alre-ady been seen in close relationship on panoramic radiograph (PR) by the comparison of findings of the cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and the PR. Materials & Methods: Close relationship between the mandibular third molar and mandibular canal was scanned in 180 patients by the PR. Images were also obtained by CBCT from patients among which a close-relationship was detected between mandibular canal and mandibular third molar. Results: Close relationship was detected between mandibular third molar and mandibular canal on 26 of 180 PR and evaluated 46 mandibular third molars. In 41 cases, both the findings in PR and in CBCT images showed compliance with each other. As a result it was clearly seen that the mandibular third molars which were detected to be in close relationship on PR were mostly also in close relationship with mandibular canal on CBCT-images. Conclusions: If the close relationship is not seen on the panoramic images then there is no need to get CBCT for extracting the mandibular third molars. By this way complication risks are eliminated with less radia-tion. However CBCT should be definitely used in cases which complete as-sessment cannot be made in no way due to artifacts such as superposition in PR.
评价下颌第三磨牙与下颌管的关系:全景x线摄影与锥束ct的比较
问题陈述:对于口腔外科医生来说,在拔牙前确定下颌第三磨牙的精确位置是很重要的。下颌管与下颌第三磨牙的密切关系是牙槽神经损伤的危险因素。目的:通过对锥束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)与全景x线片(PR)的比较,探讨下颌管与下颌第三磨牙之间的关系。对180例患者用PR扫描下颌第三磨牙与下颌管的密切关系,并对患者进行CBCT扫描,其中发现下颌管与下颌第三磨牙关系密切。结果:180例PR中26例检测到下颌第三磨牙与下颌管有密切关系,并对46颗下颌第三磨牙进行了评估。41例PR与CBCT表现一致。结果清楚地看到,在PR上被检测到密切关系的下颌第三磨牙在cbct上也大多与下颌管密切相关。结论:如果在全景图上未见密切关系,则不需要行CBCT拔除下颌第三磨牙。通过这种方式消除了并发症的风险,同时减少了辐射。然而,在由于PR中的叠加等人为因素而无法进行完整评估的情况下,绝对应该使用CBCT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信