Statistical analysis of simultaneous partial discharge measurements from IEC60270, HFCT and HFCT EMI methods

R. Gillie, A. Nesbitt, R. Ramirez-Iniguez, B. Stewart, G. Kerr
{"title":"Statistical analysis of simultaneous partial discharge measurements from IEC60270, HFCT and HFCT EMI methods","authors":"R. Gillie, A. Nesbitt, R. Ramirez-Iniguez, B. Stewart, G. Kerr","doi":"10.1109/ICACACT.2014.7223573","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper investigates correlations of Partial Discharge (PD) measurements of associated statistical parameters from phase-charge-number Φ-q-n plots from IEC60270 PD measurements and High Frequency Current Transformer (HFCT) Φ-peak-n plot PD measurements. These are also compared with Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Radio Frequency (RF) measurements. The three methods record simultaneously PD activity from 3 artificially created fault geometries on High Voltage cable sections, namely a semiconductor point fault, a large embedded particle fault and a smaller particle fault. One of the research aims is to demonstrate the potential for passive RF methods to show comparable results of fault characteristics with direct contact PD measurements. The ability to identify faults based on statistical analysis of IEC60270 Φ-q-n plot and HFCT Φ-peak-n plot deduced quantities, such as Skewness and Kurtosis is also highlighted. This is used in comparison with EMI energy in selected frequency bands to determine any related frequency characteristic changes. Comparisons for trended Skewness and Kurtosis measurements of IEC60270 vs HFCT peak measurements for the three faults are shown for the pulse count Hn(Φ)+ distribution.","PeriodicalId":101532,"journal":{"name":"2014 International Conference on Advances in Communication and Computing Technologies (ICACACT 2014)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 International Conference on Advances in Communication and Computing Technologies (ICACACT 2014)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICACACT.2014.7223573","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

This paper investigates correlations of Partial Discharge (PD) measurements of associated statistical parameters from phase-charge-number Φ-q-n plots from IEC60270 PD measurements and High Frequency Current Transformer (HFCT) Φ-peak-n plot PD measurements. These are also compared with Electromagnetic Interference (EMI) Radio Frequency (RF) measurements. The three methods record simultaneously PD activity from 3 artificially created fault geometries on High Voltage cable sections, namely a semiconductor point fault, a large embedded particle fault and a smaller particle fault. One of the research aims is to demonstrate the potential for passive RF methods to show comparable results of fault characteristics with direct contact PD measurements. The ability to identify faults based on statistical analysis of IEC60270 Φ-q-n plot and HFCT Φ-peak-n plot deduced quantities, such as Skewness and Kurtosis is also highlighted. This is used in comparison with EMI energy in selected frequency bands to determine any related frequency characteristic changes. Comparisons for trended Skewness and Kurtosis measurements of IEC60270 vs HFCT peak measurements for the three faults are shown for the pulse count Hn(Φ)+ distribution.
IEC60270, HFCT和HFCT EMI方法同时局部放电测量的统计分析
本文研究了IEC60270局部放电(PD)测量的相电荷数Φ-q-n图和高频电流互感器(HFCT) Φ-peak-n图PD测量的相关统计参数的相关性。这些还与电磁干扰(EMI)射频(RF)测量结果进行了比较。这三种方法同时记录高压电缆部分上3种人为制造的故障几何形状的PD活动,即半导体点故障、大嵌入颗粒故障和小颗粒故障。研究的目的之一是展示无源射频方法的潜力,以显示与直接接触PD测量相比较的故障特征结果。通过对IEC60270 Φ-q-n图和HFCT Φ-peak-n图推导出的偏度和峰度等量的统计分析,突出了故障识别的能力。这是用来与选定频段的电磁干扰能量进行比较,以确定任何相关的频率特性变化。脉冲计数Hn(Φ)+分布显示了IEC60270与HFCT对三个故障的峰值测量的趋势偏度和峰度测量的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信