The Application of the European SEA Directive in the Energy Sector: An Attempt to Develop the List Approach to 'Specifying Types of Energy Plans and Programmes'

Mingxue Gao
{"title":"The Application of the European SEA Directive in the Energy Sector: An Attempt to Develop the List Approach to 'Specifying Types of Energy Plans and Programmes'","authors":"Mingxue Gao","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1310461","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After four years of efforts to implement the European Directive on strategic environmental assessment (SEA), it remains unclear whether decision-making should actually be subject to the SEA Directive. Unlike the approaches adopted by the European Directive regarding the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) to facilitate its implementation, three usual approaches adopted by the European SEA Directive may jeopardize its actual implementation. These include the following: (1) No indicative list provided for plans and programmes (PPs); (2) lack of thresholds for PPs, which are likely to have significant environmental effects (LSEE); (3) the scope and types of SEA PPs is broader and more diverse than that of EIA projects. One potential method to resolve this implementation issue has been pointed out in Article 3(5) of the SEA Directive, which indicates the need to consider and develop multi-approaches, including case-by-case, list, and mixed approaches. However, the dominant SEA-related scientific and legal studies so far have focused on the development of the case-by-case approach, with less attention paid to the advantages and development of the latter two approaches. The main goals of this article are to develop the list and the mixed approaches to facilitate the actual implementation of the SEA Directive, and to apply such approaches to the energy sector, which serves as an exemplar of a traditionally environmentally-sensitive sector. As such, a broad survey of the following three areas will be conducted: energy decision-making from existing SEA cases, provision of energy decision-making in related international, European, and national legislations, and energy and climate change policy papers in selected countries. This article will further evaluate whether the aforementioned energy decision-making processes meet the criteria outlined in the SEA Directive and whether such decision-making processes should be put on the energy SEA list. Finally, a draft 'SEA Directive: Guidance for Energy Plans and Programmes' will be provided at the end of this article.","PeriodicalId":365212,"journal":{"name":"Environment & Natural Resources eJournal","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment & Natural Resources eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1310461","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After four years of efforts to implement the European Directive on strategic environmental assessment (SEA), it remains unclear whether decision-making should actually be subject to the SEA Directive. Unlike the approaches adopted by the European Directive regarding the Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) to facilitate its implementation, three usual approaches adopted by the European SEA Directive may jeopardize its actual implementation. These include the following: (1) No indicative list provided for plans and programmes (PPs); (2) lack of thresholds for PPs, which are likely to have significant environmental effects (LSEE); (3) the scope and types of SEA PPs is broader and more diverse than that of EIA projects. One potential method to resolve this implementation issue has been pointed out in Article 3(5) of the SEA Directive, which indicates the need to consider and develop multi-approaches, including case-by-case, list, and mixed approaches. However, the dominant SEA-related scientific and legal studies so far have focused on the development of the case-by-case approach, with less attention paid to the advantages and development of the latter two approaches. The main goals of this article are to develop the list and the mixed approaches to facilitate the actual implementation of the SEA Directive, and to apply such approaches to the energy sector, which serves as an exemplar of a traditionally environmentally-sensitive sector. As such, a broad survey of the following three areas will be conducted: energy decision-making from existing SEA cases, provision of energy decision-making in related international, European, and national legislations, and energy and climate change policy papers in selected countries. This article will further evaluate whether the aforementioned energy decision-making processes meet the criteria outlined in the SEA Directive and whether such decision-making processes should be put on the energy SEA list. Finally, a draft 'SEA Directive: Guidance for Energy Plans and Programmes' will be provided at the end of this article.
欧洲SEA指令在能源领域的应用:制定“指定能源计划和项目类型”的清单方法的尝试
在实施《欧洲战略环境评估指令》(SEA)四年之后,决策是否应实际遵守《战略环境评估指令》仍不清楚。与欧洲环境影响评估指令为促进其实施而采用的方法不同,欧洲环境影响评估指令采用的三种通常方法可能危及其实际实施。其中包括:(1)没有为计划和方案提供指示性清单;(2)缺乏可能产生重大环境影响的PPs阈值(LSEE);(3)环评项目的范围和类型较环评项目更为广泛和多样化。SEA指令第3(5)条指出了解决这一实施问题的一种潜在方法,这表明需要考虑和开发多种方法,包括逐案、清单和混合方法。然而,到目前为止,与sea相关的主要科学和法律研究都集中在逐案方法的发展上,对后两种方法的优势和发展关注较少。本文的主要目标是制定清单和混合方法,以促进SEA指令的实际实施,并将这些方法应用于能源部门,作为传统环境敏感部门的典范。因此,将对以下三个领域进行广泛的调查:从现有的SEA案例中进行能源决策,在相关的国际、欧洲和国家立法中提供能源决策,以及选定国家的能源和气候变化政策文件。本文将进一步评估上述能源决策过程是否符合SEA指令中概述的标准,以及此类决策过程是否应列入能源SEA清单。最后,将在本文末尾提供“SEA指令:能源计划和项目指导”草案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信