Support Vector Machine, Naïve Baye’s, and Recurrent Neural Network to Detect Data Poisoning Attacks on Dataset

Ravina Vasant Bhadle, D. Rathod
{"title":"Support Vector Machine, Naïve Baye’s, and Recurrent Neural Network to Detect Data Poisoning Attacks on Dataset","authors":"Ravina Vasant Bhadle, D. Rathod","doi":"10.1109/ICNTE56631.2023.10146665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Machine learning is a subset of artificial intelligence, that has revolutionalized the world in recent days. The machine learning model will be trained and tested on the collection of huge data, a large portion is for training and others for testing. data has been collected from trusted or untrusted sources, and results will be predicted using different algorithms. People are getting used to these predictions, are these predictions secure, trustful, or guaranteed? Well, that will be decided by the quality of the datasets. Although the datasets can be poisoned easily. Here the proposed work is providing a solution to check the quality of the dataset used for machine learning algorithms. The basis of the research is to detect poisoning attacks in the data set and to determine the most accurate estimate of the detection of poisoning attacks. comparing accuracies of the supervised machine learning algorithms Support Vector Machine(SVM), Naive Baye’s Classifier (NBC), and deep learning algorithms Recurrent Neural Network(RNN).The evaluation report was submitted for the results obtained using the rating report. The classification report considers performance measures the Precision, Accuracy, and F1 score of each algorithm.","PeriodicalId":158124,"journal":{"name":"2023 5th Biennial International Conference on Nascent Technologies in Engineering (ICNTE)","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2023 5th Biennial International Conference on Nascent Technologies in Engineering (ICNTE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICNTE56631.2023.10146665","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Machine learning is a subset of artificial intelligence, that has revolutionalized the world in recent days. The machine learning model will be trained and tested on the collection of huge data, a large portion is for training and others for testing. data has been collected from trusted or untrusted sources, and results will be predicted using different algorithms. People are getting used to these predictions, are these predictions secure, trustful, or guaranteed? Well, that will be decided by the quality of the datasets. Although the datasets can be poisoned easily. Here the proposed work is providing a solution to check the quality of the dataset used for machine learning algorithms. The basis of the research is to detect poisoning attacks in the data set and to determine the most accurate estimate of the detection of poisoning attacks. comparing accuracies of the supervised machine learning algorithms Support Vector Machine(SVM), Naive Baye’s Classifier (NBC), and deep learning algorithms Recurrent Neural Network(RNN).The evaluation report was submitted for the results obtained using the rating report. The classification report considers performance measures the Precision, Accuracy, and F1 score of each algorithm.
支持向量机,Naïve贝叶斯和递归神经网络检测数据集中毒攻击
机器学习是人工智能的一个子集,近年来已经彻底改变了世界。机器学习模型将在海量数据的集合上进行训练和测试,其中很大一部分用于训练,另一部分用于测试。数据从可信或不可信的来源收集,结果将使用不同的算法进行预测。人们已经习惯了这些预测,这些预测是安全的、可信的还是有保证的?这取决于数据集的质量。尽管数据集很容易被毒害。这里提出的工作是提供一个解决方案来检查用于机器学习算法的数据集的质量。研究的基础是在数据集中检测中毒攻击,并确定中毒攻击检测的最准确估计。比较了监督机器学习算法支持向量机(SVM)、朴素贝叶斯分类器(NBC)和深度学习算法递归神经网络(RNN)的准确性。评估报告是针对使用评级报告获得的结果提交的。分类报告考虑的性能指标包括每种算法的Precision、Accuracy和F1分数。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信