What Are the Monetary Systems Leading Most Likely to Business Cycles?

Rui Santos
{"title":"What Are the Monetary Systems Leading Most Likely to Business Cycles?","authors":"Rui Santos","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3556453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is widely regarded that a monetary system like the predominant present one, with fractional reserve banking and central bank money creation, is very prone to the frequent occurrence of business cycles characterized by a phase of economic expansion followed by a phase of recession. In this paper I assess this and other monetary systems regarding their tendency to avoid business cycles. In particular, besides the present one, it is then analyzed a system that keeps the central bank as monopolist producer of money but with no fractional reserves by commercial banks; a commodity money system with no fractional reserves and, finally, a monetary system with a constant volume of money supply. Some of the features of the system known as “free-banking” are also assessed. The conclusion is that the best monetary systems in the sense of the avoidance of recurrent business cycles are the ones with constant money supply or with a commodity money with no fractional reserves. Regarding the former, some fears are usually advanced because of its supposed “deflationary” character. It is then shown that, in this system, price deflation is only a consequence of economic growth and is a sign of lower unit costs of production due to a rise in productivity. In particular it is shown that in this system of constant monetary supply with increasing output and a corresponding fall in commodity prices the fears associated with “bad deflation” – a decrease in money supply – are unfounded.","PeriodicalId":291048,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Business Fluctuations; Cycles (Topic)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Business Fluctuations; Cycles (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3556453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

It is widely regarded that a monetary system like the predominant present one, with fractional reserve banking and central bank money creation, is very prone to the frequent occurrence of business cycles characterized by a phase of economic expansion followed by a phase of recession. In this paper I assess this and other monetary systems regarding their tendency to avoid business cycles. In particular, besides the present one, it is then analyzed a system that keeps the central bank as monopolist producer of money but with no fractional reserves by commercial banks; a commodity money system with no fractional reserves and, finally, a monetary system with a constant volume of money supply. Some of the features of the system known as “free-banking” are also assessed. The conclusion is that the best monetary systems in the sense of the avoidance of recurrent business cycles are the ones with constant money supply or with a commodity money with no fractional reserves. Regarding the former, some fears are usually advanced because of its supposed “deflationary” character. It is then shown that, in this system, price deflation is only a consequence of economic growth and is a sign of lower unit costs of production due to a rise in productivity. In particular it is shown that in this system of constant monetary supply with increasing output and a corresponding fall in commodity prices the fears associated with “bad deflation” – a decrease in money supply – are unfounded.
哪些货币体系最有可能引领商业周期?
人们普遍认为,像目前占主导地位的货币体系,由部分准备金银行和中央银行创造货币,很容易出现商业周期的频繁发生,其特征是经济扩张阶段随后是经济衰退阶段。在本文中,我对这种货币体系和其他货币体系规避商业周期的倾向进行了评估。特别地,在目前的基础上,分析了一种保持中央银行作为垄断货币生产者,但商业银行没有部分准备金的制度;一个是没有部分准备金的商品货币体系,最后一个是货币供应量恒定的货币体系。被称为“自由银行”的系统的一些特征也被评估。结论是,在避免周期性商业周期的意义上,最好的货币体系是货币供应不变或没有部分准备金的商品货币。对于前者,由于其所谓的“通缩”特征,一些担忧通常是超前的。然后表明,在这个体系中,价格通缩只是经济增长的结果,是由于生产率提高而导致单位生产成本降低的一个标志。特别是,它表明,在这个货币供应不断增加、产出增加和商品价格相应下降的体系中,与“严重通货紧缩”(货币供应减少)有关的担忧是没有根据的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信