The Foundations of the Concept of Trust Under Bounded Rationality: Competence, Values Systems, Unselfishness and the Development of Virtue

Josep M. Rosanas, Natàlia Cugueró-Escofet
{"title":"The Foundations of the Concept of Trust Under Bounded Rationality: Competence, Values Systems, Unselfishness and the Development of Virtue","authors":"Josep M. Rosanas, Natàlia Cugueró-Escofet","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2518625","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper intends to analyze the foundations of trust in a context of bounded rationality. Building on previous work, we show how bounded rationality provides a rationale for the concept of trust that goes beyond the common calculative notion. We show that there are four types of trust, and that people assess probabilities (with some fuzziness, in the context of bounded rationality) in order to determine whether to trust a recipient, depending on each of the four. We follow previous work, mainly by Mayer, Davis and Schoorman (1995) and show how bounded rationality provides additional arguments to show how competence (similar to ability), value systems (similar to integrity) and unselfishness (similar to benevolence) are necessary to underpin trust. We establish the parallel between the three aspects of trustworthiness that appear in their previous work but we add additional explanations focused on bounded rationality. We also go one step further to consider the development of virtue as a crucial fourth aspect, which also supports the argument that trust can be reinforced between people and developed through time.","PeriodicalId":395628,"journal":{"name":"IESE Business School Working Paper Series","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-06-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IESE Business School Working Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2518625","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This paper intends to analyze the foundations of trust in a context of bounded rationality. Building on previous work, we show how bounded rationality provides a rationale for the concept of trust that goes beyond the common calculative notion. We show that there are four types of trust, and that people assess probabilities (with some fuzziness, in the context of bounded rationality) in order to determine whether to trust a recipient, depending on each of the four. We follow previous work, mainly by Mayer, Davis and Schoorman (1995) and show how bounded rationality provides additional arguments to show how competence (similar to ability), value systems (similar to integrity) and unselfishness (similar to benevolence) are necessary to underpin trust. We establish the parallel between the three aspects of trustworthiness that appear in their previous work but we add additional explanations focused on bounded rationality. We also go one step further to consider the development of virtue as a crucial fourth aspect, which also supports the argument that trust can be reinforced between people and developed through time.
有限理性下信任概念的基础:能力、价值体系、无私与美德的发展
本文旨在分析有限理性背景下信任的基础。在之前工作的基础上,我们展示了有限理性如何为信任概念提供了一个超越普通计算概念的基本原理。我们展示了四种类型的信任,人们评估概率(在有限理性的背景下,有一些模糊),以确定是否信任接收者,这取决于四种类型中的每一种。我们遵循先前的工作,主要是Mayer, Davis和Schoorman(1995)的工作,并展示有限理性如何提供额外的论据来证明能力(类似于能力),价值体系(类似于正直)和无私(类似于仁慈)是支撑信任的必要条件。我们在可信度的三个方面之间建立了平行关系,这些方面出现在他们之前的工作中,但我们增加了额外的解释,重点是有限理性。我们还进一步将美德的发展视为至关重要的第四个方面,这也支持了人与人之间的信任可以加强并随着时间的推移而发展的论点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信