The multiplicative power of consensus numbers

Damien Imbs, M. Raynal
{"title":"The multiplicative power of consensus numbers","authors":"Damien Imbs, M. Raynal","doi":"10.1145/1835698.1835705","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Borowsky-Gafni (BG) simulation algorithm is a powerful reduction algorithm that shows that t-resilience of decision tasks can be fully characterized in terms of wait-freedom. Said in another way, the BG simulation shows that the crucial parameter is not the number n of processes but the upper bound t on the number of processes that are allowed to crash. The BG algorithm considers colorless decision tasks in the base read/write shared memory model. (Colorless means that if, process decides a value, any other process is allowed to decide the very same value.) This paper considers system models made up of n processes prone to up to t crashes, and where the processes communicate by accessing read/write atomic registers (as assumed by the BG) and (differently from the BG) objects with consensus number x accessible by at most x processes (with x ≤ t < n). Let ASM(n,t,x) denote such a system model. While the BG simulation has shown that the models ASM(n,t,1) and ASM(t+1,t,1) are equivalent, this paper focuses the pair (t,x) of parameters of a system model. Its main result is the following: the system models ASM (n1,t1,x1) and ASM (n2,t2,x2) have the same computational power for colorless decision tasks if and only if ⌊t1⁄x1⌋ = ⌊t1⁄x1⌋. As can be seen, this contribution complements and extends the BG simulation. It shows that consensus numbers have a multiplicative power with respect to failures, namely the system models ASM(n,t',x) and ASM(n,t,1) are equivalent for colorless decision tasks iff (t x x) ≤ t' ≤ (t x x)+(x-1).","PeriodicalId":447863,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS symposium on Principles of distributed computing","volume":"33 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"21","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 29th ACM SIGACT-SIGOPS symposium on Principles of distributed computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1835698.1835705","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 21

Abstract

The Borowsky-Gafni (BG) simulation algorithm is a powerful reduction algorithm that shows that t-resilience of decision tasks can be fully characterized in terms of wait-freedom. Said in another way, the BG simulation shows that the crucial parameter is not the number n of processes but the upper bound t on the number of processes that are allowed to crash. The BG algorithm considers colorless decision tasks in the base read/write shared memory model. (Colorless means that if, process decides a value, any other process is allowed to decide the very same value.) This paper considers system models made up of n processes prone to up to t crashes, and where the processes communicate by accessing read/write atomic registers (as assumed by the BG) and (differently from the BG) objects with consensus number x accessible by at most x processes (with x ≤ t < n). Let ASM(n,t,x) denote such a system model. While the BG simulation has shown that the models ASM(n,t,1) and ASM(t+1,t,1) are equivalent, this paper focuses the pair (t,x) of parameters of a system model. Its main result is the following: the system models ASM (n1,t1,x1) and ASM (n2,t2,x2) have the same computational power for colorless decision tasks if and only if ⌊t1⁄x1⌋ = ⌊t1⁄x1⌋. As can be seen, this contribution complements and extends the BG simulation. It shows that consensus numbers have a multiplicative power with respect to failures, namely the system models ASM(n,t',x) and ASM(n,t,1) are equivalent for colorless decision tasks iff (t x x) ≤ t' ≤ (t x x)+(x-1).
共识数的乘法能力
Borowsky-Gafni (BG)仿真算法是一种功能强大的约简算法,它表明决策任务的t弹性可以完全用等待自由来表征。换句话说,BG模拟表明关键参数不是进程的数目n,而是允许崩溃的进程数目的上限t。BG算法在基本读写共享内存模型中考虑无色决策任务。(无色意味着如果一个进程决定了一个值,任何其他进程都可以决定相同的值。)本文考虑由n个容易崩溃的进程组成的系统模型,其中进程通过访问读/写原子寄存器(如BG所假设的)和(与BG不同的)具有最多x个进程(x≤t < n)可访问的共识数x的对象进行通信。设ASM(n,t,x)表示这样的系统模型。虽然BG仿真表明ASM(n,t,1)和ASM(t+1,t,1)模型是等价的,但本文关注的是系统模型参数对(t,x)。其主要结果如下:系统模型ASM (n1,t1,x1)和ASM (n2,t2,x2)对于无色决策任务具有相同的计算能力,当且仅当⌊t1⁄x1⌋=⌊t1⁄x1⌋。可以看到,这个贡献补充并扩展了BG模拟。结果表明,共识数对失败具有乘法能力,即系统模型ASM(n,t',x)和ASM(n,t,1)对于(t x x)≤t'≤(t x x)+(x-1)的无色决策任务是等价的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信