Muhammad Hasnat Akhtar, Anum Ashfaq, Ahmed Murtaz Khalid, Mukhtiar Baig
{"title":"Stress levels among pre-clinical Medical students and their coping strategies","authors":"Muhammad Hasnat Akhtar, Anum Ashfaq, Ahmed Murtaz Khalid, Mukhtiar Baig","doi":"10.37723/jumdc.v14i1.783","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Stress is no doubt prevalent among medical students. Insight into how different personality types cope with this challenge might give the opportunity to healthcare authorities to devise a more standardized guideline for conducting a psychological aptitude test at the time of intake into medical school. Our objective is to look at the stress and anxiety among medical students and how different personality types cope with stress. \nMETHODOLOGY: A Cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out at CMH Kharian Medical College from November 2020 to May 2021. Agha Khan University, Anxiety and Depression Scale was employed to assess stress and anxiety levels among medical students. Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) was used to identify personality traits, and the “Brief COPE Inventory Scale” was employed to investigate stress coping styles(approach or avoidant) among students. SPSS was used to analyze the results. \nRESULTS: Out of 158 participants, 108(68.4%) were females, and 50(31.6%) were males. More than half of the preclinical medical students, 93(58.86%) were having stress [females 73(67.59%), males 20(40%)]. Personality types showed that 100(63.3%) students belonged to the introvert group, while 58(36.7%) students belonged to the extrovert group. Most participants, 144(91%) students, adopted approach coping styles rather than avoidant ones (14 (8.86%). Stress was significantly associated with personality types (p=0.021), coping style (p=0.007), and gender (female) (p=0.001). However, we did not find any association between personality types & coping styles (p=0.936). \nCONCLUSION: High level of stress and anxiety (58.86%) was found among students and was more prevalent among females and extroverted medical students. Both personality types (extroverts and introverts) used approach coping styles rather than avoidant trends.","PeriodicalId":178216,"journal":{"name":"Journal of University Medical & Dental College","volume":"23 9","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of University Medical & Dental College","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37723/jumdc.v14i1.783","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: Stress is no doubt prevalent among medical students. Insight into how different personality types cope with this challenge might give the opportunity to healthcare authorities to devise a more standardized guideline for conducting a psychological aptitude test at the time of intake into medical school. Our objective is to look at the stress and anxiety among medical students and how different personality types cope with stress.
METHODOLOGY: A Cross-sectional descriptive study was carried out at CMH Kharian Medical College from November 2020 to May 2021. Agha Khan University, Anxiety and Depression Scale was employed to assess stress and anxiety levels among medical students. Myers–Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) was used to identify personality traits, and the “Brief COPE Inventory Scale” was employed to investigate stress coping styles(approach or avoidant) among students. SPSS was used to analyze the results.
RESULTS: Out of 158 participants, 108(68.4%) were females, and 50(31.6%) were males. More than half of the preclinical medical students, 93(58.86%) were having stress [females 73(67.59%), males 20(40%)]. Personality types showed that 100(63.3%) students belonged to the introvert group, while 58(36.7%) students belonged to the extrovert group. Most participants, 144(91%) students, adopted approach coping styles rather than avoidant ones (14 (8.86%). Stress was significantly associated with personality types (p=0.021), coping style (p=0.007), and gender (female) (p=0.001). However, we did not find any association between personality types & coping styles (p=0.936).
CONCLUSION: High level of stress and anxiety (58.86%) was found among students and was more prevalent among females and extroverted medical students. Both personality types (extroverts and introverts) used approach coping styles rather than avoidant trends.
背景与目的:压力无疑在医学生中普遍存在。深入了解不同的性格类型是如何应对这一挑战的,可能会给医疗机构提供机会,设计一个更标准化的指导方针,在医学院入学时进行心理能力测试。我们的目的是观察医学生的压力和焦虑以及不同性格类型的人如何应对压力。方法:从2020年11月至2021年5月在CMH Kharian医学院进行了一项横断面描述性研究。采用阿迦汗大学焦虑抑郁量表评估医学生的压力和焦虑水平。采用MBTI (Myers-Briggs Type Indicator)识别学生的人格特征,采用《简明COPE量表》调查学生的压力应对方式(接近型和回避型)。采用SPSS软件对结果进行分析。结果:158名参与者中,女性108人(68.4%),男性50人(31.6%)。超过半数的预科医学生存在压力,有93人(58.86%)存在压力,其中女73人(67.59%),男20人(40%)。性格类型显示,内向组有100人(63.3%),外向组有58人(36.7%)。大多数被试(144人,占91%)采用接近型应对方式,而回避型应对方式(14人,占8.86%)较少。压力与人格类型(p=0.021)、应对方式(p=0.007)和性别(女性)(p=0.001)显著相关。然而,我们没有发现人格类型与应对方式之间的任何关联(p=0.936)。结论:医学生中存在高水平的压力和焦虑(58.86%),且在女性和外向型医学生中更为普遍。两种性格类型(外向者和内向者)都使用接近型应对方式,而不是回避型。