Metronidazole for bacterial vaginosis. A comparison of vaginal gel vs. oral therapy.

Jane M. Hanson, James A. McGregor, Sharon L. Hillier, D. Eschenbach, A. Karen Kreutner, Rudolph P. Galask, Mark Martens
{"title":"Metronidazole for bacterial vaginosis. A comparison of vaginal gel vs. oral therapy.","authors":"Jane M. Hanson, James A. McGregor, Sharon L. Hillier, D. Eschenbach, A. Karen Kreutner, Rudolph P. Galask, Mark Martens","doi":"10.1097/00006254-200103000-00014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo compare the efficacy and safety of 0.75% metronidazole vaginal gel with oral metronidazole for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis (BV).\n\n\nSTUDY DESIGN\nNonpregnant women with BV were enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, investigator-blind treatment trial. Patients were randomly assigned to either 0.75% metronidazole vaginal gel (5 g twice daily for five days) or oral metronidazole (500 mg twice daily for seven days). Follow-up visits occurred approximately two and five weeks after initiation of therapy.\n\n\nRESULTS\nBV was clinically eliminated at the first follow-up visit in 83.7% (36/43, 95% CI 72.3-95.1%) of the intravaginal group and 85.1% (40/47, 95% CI 74.6-95.6%) of the oral group. At the final visit, BV was eliminated in 70.7% (29/41, 95% CI 56.3-85.1%) of the intravaginal group and 71.1% (32/45, 95% CI 57.4-84.8%) of the oral group. Significantly more patients in the oral treatment group (51.8%) reported gastrointestinal complaints as compared to the intravaginal treatment group (32.7%, P = .04).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nThe efficacy of 0.75% metronidazole vaginal gel twice daily for five days in treating BV was similar to that of standard oral metronidazole treatment and was associated with fewer gastrointestinal complaints.","PeriodicalId":192418,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"78","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of reproductive medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/00006254-200103000-00014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 78

Abstract

OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and safety of 0.75% metronidazole vaginal gel with oral metronidazole for the treatment of bacterial vaginosis (BV). STUDY DESIGN Nonpregnant women with BV were enrolled in a multicenter, randomized, investigator-blind treatment trial. Patients were randomly assigned to either 0.75% metronidazole vaginal gel (5 g twice daily for five days) or oral metronidazole (500 mg twice daily for seven days). Follow-up visits occurred approximately two and five weeks after initiation of therapy. RESULTS BV was clinically eliminated at the first follow-up visit in 83.7% (36/43, 95% CI 72.3-95.1%) of the intravaginal group and 85.1% (40/47, 95% CI 74.6-95.6%) of the oral group. At the final visit, BV was eliminated in 70.7% (29/41, 95% CI 56.3-85.1%) of the intravaginal group and 71.1% (32/45, 95% CI 57.4-84.8%) of the oral group. Significantly more patients in the oral treatment group (51.8%) reported gastrointestinal complaints as compared to the intravaginal treatment group (32.7%, P = .04). CONCLUSION The efficacy of 0.75% metronidazole vaginal gel twice daily for five days in treating BV was similar to that of standard oral metronidazole treatment and was associated with fewer gastrointestinal complaints.
甲硝唑治疗细菌性阴道病。阴道凝胶与口服治疗的比较。
目的比较0.75%甲硝唑阴道凝胶与口服甲硝唑治疗细菌性阴道病(BV)的疗效和安全性。研究设计:未怀孕的BV患者被纳入一项多中心、随机、研究者盲治疗试验。患者被随机分配使用0.75%甲硝唑阴道凝胶(5 g,每天2次,连续5天)或口服甲硝唑(500 mg,每天2次,连续7天)。随访在治疗开始后约2周和5周进行。结果阴道内组和口服组分别有83.7% (36/43,95% CI 72.3 ~ 95.1%)和85.1% (40/47,95% CI 74.6 ~ 95.6%)的患者在第一次随访时临床消除bv。在最后一次就诊时,阴道内组70.7% (29/41,95% CI 56.3-85.1%)和口服组71.1% (32/45,95% CI 56.4 -84.8%)的BV被消除。与阴道内治疗组(32.7%,P = 0.04)相比,口服治疗组(51.8%)有更多的患者报告了胃肠道不适。结论0.75%甲硝唑阴道凝胶治疗细菌性阴道炎的疗效与标准口服甲硝唑治疗相似,且伴有较少的胃肠道不适。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信