Crisis and Praxis in Lukács’ History and Class Consciousness

Konstantinos Kavoulakos
{"title":"Crisis and Praxis in Lukács’ History and Class Consciousness","authors":"Konstantinos Kavoulakos","doi":"10.1521/siso.2023.87.2.161","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Lukács’ early Marxist thought in the 1920s, crisis is understood as an expression of a deeper dissonance of social life that reveals the violence inflicted upon humans even in “normal” social conditions. The experience of crisis can thus lead to new forms of social consciousness and, consequently, to a “revolutionizing praxis.” However, this transition is in no way mechanically necessary, as crisis can also be perpetuated and temporarily “overcome” through the restoration of dominant power relations. However, the relative instability of the system during a crisis calls us to think about the appropriate forms of organizing collective political practice to effectively intervene in the historical continuum, instead of letting historical automatism be restored.","PeriodicalId":132404,"journal":{"name":"Science & Society","volume":"56 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1521/siso.2023.87.2.161","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Lukács’ early Marxist thought in the 1920s, crisis is understood as an expression of a deeper dissonance of social life that reveals the violence inflicted upon humans even in “normal” social conditions. The experience of crisis can thus lead to new forms of social consciousness and, consequently, to a “revolutionizing praxis.” However, this transition is in no way mechanically necessary, as crisis can also be perpetuated and temporarily “overcome” through the restoration of dominant power relations. However, the relative instability of the system during a crisis calls us to think about the appropriate forms of organizing collective political practice to effectively intervene in the historical continuum, instead of letting historical automatism be restored.
Lukács《历史与阶级意识》中的危机与实践
在Lukács 20世纪20年代早期的马克思主义思想中,危机被理解为社会生活中更深层次的不和谐的表达,它揭示了即使在“正常”的社会条件下,对人类施加的暴力。因此,危机的经验可以导致新形式的社会意识,从而导致“革命性的实践”。然而,这种转变绝不是机械上的必要,因为危机也可以通过恢复主导权力关系而延续和暂时“克服”。然而,危机期间制度的相对不稳定性要求我们思考组织集体政治实践的适当形式,以有效干预历史连续体,而不是让历史自动主义恢复。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信