8 Postwar Popular Politics: Integrating the Voice of the People in Postwar Political History

Harm Kaal, V. Griend
{"title":"8 Postwar Popular Politics: Integrating the Voice of the People in Postwar Political History","authors":"Harm Kaal, V. Griend","doi":"10.1163/9789004291966_009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Both inside and outside of academia, a declining trust in politicians and the rise of populism has catalysed a debate about a supposed “crisis of democracy.”1 Political decision-making has increasingly escaped public control, particularly at the level of the European Union. The public sphere spiralled into decline when citizens turned into passive consumers who focused on private instead of public concerns.2 Moreover, with the laws and mechanisms of the mass media dictating political communication, parliamentary democracy has transformed into a mediacracy or drama democracy. Against this background, populist politicians have emerged on the scene, promising to restore the power of the people. One should, however, be careful not to integrate populist notions of crisis and of confrontation between political elites and the people into the historical analysis of political representation. We argue that at the heart of the discourse of crisis is a lack of understanding of the multifaceted ways in which politicians and the people have interacted. In this chapter, which is based on a case study of the Netherlands, we first offer a reconceptualisation of the notion of popular politics by mapping the repertoire of communicative practices through which political representatives and the people they represented have interacted in the postwar years. Second, we zoom in on one of these practices: letters people sent to their representatives. The analysis will be aimed at identifying popular perceptions of political representation that were articulated in these letters. Third, we end by offering a way forward for historical research on the interaction between politicians and the people. The vast scholarship on political representation in parliamentary democracies has been mostly oriented towards the “formal” aspects of political representation treating it as a status that results from particular political procedures and constitutional arrangements with research being dedicated to an investi-","PeriodicalId":432812,"journal":{"name":"New Perspectives on Power and Political Representation from Ancient History to the Present Day","volume":"90 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Perspectives on Power and Political Representation from Ancient History to the Present Day","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004291966_009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Both inside and outside of academia, a declining trust in politicians and the rise of populism has catalysed a debate about a supposed “crisis of democracy.”1 Political decision-making has increasingly escaped public control, particularly at the level of the European Union. The public sphere spiralled into decline when citizens turned into passive consumers who focused on private instead of public concerns.2 Moreover, with the laws and mechanisms of the mass media dictating political communication, parliamentary democracy has transformed into a mediacracy or drama democracy. Against this background, populist politicians have emerged on the scene, promising to restore the power of the people. One should, however, be careful not to integrate populist notions of crisis and of confrontation between political elites and the people into the historical analysis of political representation. We argue that at the heart of the discourse of crisis is a lack of understanding of the multifaceted ways in which politicians and the people have interacted. In this chapter, which is based on a case study of the Netherlands, we first offer a reconceptualisation of the notion of popular politics by mapping the repertoire of communicative practices through which political representatives and the people they represented have interacted in the postwar years. Second, we zoom in on one of these practices: letters people sent to their representatives. The analysis will be aimed at identifying popular perceptions of political representation that were articulated in these letters. Third, we end by offering a way forward for historical research on the interaction between politicians and the people. The vast scholarship on political representation in parliamentary democracies has been mostly oriented towards the “formal” aspects of political representation treating it as a status that results from particular political procedures and constitutional arrangements with research being dedicated to an investi-
8战后大众政治:在战后政治史中整合人民的声音
在学术界内外,对政治家信任度的下降和民粹主义的兴起都引发了一场关于所谓“民主危机”的辩论。政治决策越来越不受公众控制,尤其是在欧盟层面。当公民变成被动的消费者,把注意力放在个人而不是公共事务上时,公共领域就开始走下坡路此外,随着大众传媒支配政治传播的法律和机制,议会民主已经转变为媒介民主或戏剧民主。在这样的背景下,承诺恢复国民权力的民粹主义政治家们出现了。然而,人们应该小心,不要把危机和政治精英与人民之间对抗的民粹主义概念纳入政治代表性的历史分析。我们认为,危机话语的核心是缺乏对政治家和人民互动的多方面方式的理解。在本章中,我们以荷兰的一个案例研究为基础,首先通过绘制政治代表和他们所代表的人民在战后几年进行互动的交流实践的曲目,对大众政治的概念进行了重新概念化。第二,我们聚焦其中一种做法:人们给他们的代表写信。分析的目的是确定这些信件中所阐述的对政治代表的普遍看法。最后,为政治家与民众互动的历史研究提供了一个前进的方向。关于议会制民主国家的政治代表权的大量学术研究大多侧重于政治代表权的“正式”方面,将其视为一种由特定政治程序和宪法安排产生的地位,研究致力于投资
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信