A Study of improvement methods for determining brain death and organ transplantation

Chang-kyu Lee, Joo-Hee Kim, Su-Dong Kim
{"title":"A Study of improvement methods for determining brain death and organ transplantation","authors":"Chang-kyu Lee, Joo-Hee Kim, Su-Dong Kim","doi":"10.22397/bml.2022.28.229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Act on Organ Transplantation makes it possible to judge brain death with the consent of the bereaved family, even if the donor does not express his/her intention to donate in writing before death, as long as the donor does not express his/her intention to the contrary. Legislation on long-term donations is a new area that was created relatively recently and is still developing with the development of medical and life science technology. It can be said that it is meaningful to examine the current state of overseas legal systems and the content of legislation in order to identify and improve the problems of laws related to transplantation of organs and other organs. In particular, Germany had an organ transplant scandal (Organspende-Skandal) based on changes in organ transplantation, followed by institutional changes. On this basis, we examined the long-term harvest requirements and consent of the German organ transplantation law and derived some improvements in our organ transplantation law. \nFirst, as with the consent requirements for determining brain death, there is a problem as to whether or not the bereaved family can refuse the donation despite the donor's consent. If the bereaved family has inherent rights to the long-term donation after the donor's death, the bereaved family will naturally have the right to veto the long-term donation. In the Korean method of determining the scope of relatives, which does not allow such relatives to have the right of veto, it would be a problem to neglect the person's right to self-determination. \nThe second is the scope of long-term donors and recipients. Under the Organ Transplantation Law, family members or bereaved families are the subjects of consent or refusal of long-term donation of organs from donors. German long-term transplant law stipulates that close relatives and decision-making authority must only be given to the donor if they have had personal contact within the last two years prior to death. there is That is, close relatives are primarily spouses or registered Lebenspartners, children, parents, siblings and grandparents. In addition, if an arrangement is made among close relatives and there are multiple close relatives in the same position, it is sufficient if one of them satisfies the above circumstances.","PeriodicalId":430360,"journal":{"name":"Wonkwang University Legal Research Institute","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Wonkwang University Legal Research Institute","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22397/bml.2022.28.229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Act on Organ Transplantation makes it possible to judge brain death with the consent of the bereaved family, even if the donor does not express his/her intention to donate in writing before death, as long as the donor does not express his/her intention to the contrary. Legislation on long-term donations is a new area that was created relatively recently and is still developing with the development of medical and life science technology. It can be said that it is meaningful to examine the current state of overseas legal systems and the content of legislation in order to identify and improve the problems of laws related to transplantation of organs and other organs. In particular, Germany had an organ transplant scandal (Organspende-Skandal) based on changes in organ transplantation, followed by institutional changes. On this basis, we examined the long-term harvest requirements and consent of the German organ transplantation law and derived some improvements in our organ transplantation law. First, as with the consent requirements for determining brain death, there is a problem as to whether or not the bereaved family can refuse the donation despite the donor's consent. If the bereaved family has inherent rights to the long-term donation after the donor's death, the bereaved family will naturally have the right to veto the long-term donation. In the Korean method of determining the scope of relatives, which does not allow such relatives to have the right of veto, it would be a problem to neglect the person's right to self-determination. The second is the scope of long-term donors and recipients. Under the Organ Transplantation Law, family members or bereaved families are the subjects of consent or refusal of long-term donation of organs from donors. German long-term transplant law stipulates that close relatives and decision-making authority must only be given to the donor if they have had personal contact within the last two years prior to death. there is That is, close relatives are primarily spouses or registered Lebenspartners, children, parents, siblings and grandparents. In addition, if an arrangement is made among close relatives and there are multiple close relatives in the same position, it is sufficient if one of them satisfies the above circumstances.
脑死亡与器官移植判定方法的改进研究
《器官移植法》规定,即使捐赠者没有在死亡前以书面形式表示他/她的捐赠意图,只要捐赠者没有表示相反的意图,也可以在获得死者家属同意的情况下判断脑死亡。关于长期捐赠的立法是一个相对较新的领域,随着医学和生命科学技术的发展,仍在不断发展。可以说,审视海外法律制度的现状和立法内容,对于发现和完善器官移植等器官移植相关法律存在的问题,具有十分重要的意义。特别是,德国发生了以器官移植变化为基础的器官移植丑闻(organspend - skandal),随后发生了制度变化。在此基础上,我们考察了德国器官移植法的长期摘取要求和同意,得出我国器官移植法的一些改进。首先,与确定脑死亡的同意要求一样,存在一个问题,即在捐赠者同意的情况下,死者家属是否可以拒绝捐赠。如果遗属在捐赠人死后对长期捐赠具有固有的权利,那么遗属自然就拥有否决长期捐赠的权利。在韩国确定亲属范围的方法中,不允许亲属拥有否决权,这将是一个忽视个人自决权的问题。二是长期捐助者和受援国的范围。根据《器官移植法》,家庭成员或死者家属是同意或拒绝捐赠者长期捐赠器官的主体。德国长期移植法规定,只有在死亡前两年内与捐赠者有过私人接触的亲属和决策权才能授予捐赠者。也就是说,近亲主要是配偶或注册的同居伙伴、子女、父母、兄弟姐妹和祖父母。另外,近亲属之间有安排,同一职务上有多名近亲属的,只要其中一人符合上述条件即可。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信