Automated Well Log Interpretation Through Machine Learning

Wassem M. Alward, Mohammed Al-Jubouri, Ling Zongfa, Xu Xiaori, Xu Wei, Zhao Yufang
{"title":"Automated Well Log Interpretation Through Machine Learning","authors":"Wassem M. Alward, Mohammed Al-Jubouri, Ling Zongfa, Xu Xiaori, Xu Wei, Zhao Yufang","doi":"10.2118/214055-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Well logs present a concise, in-depth representation of formation parameters. These logs allow interpreters to identify different rock types, distinguish porous from non-porous rocks, and quickly identify pay zones in subsurface formations. The ability to interpret well logs is largely dependent on the interpreter's ability to recognize patterns, past experiences, and knowledge of each measurement. Traditionally, logs were manually corrected for anomalies and normalized at the field scale, which is a time-consuming and often subjective approach. This is especially true for mature fields where log data has been collected from multiple sources. However, the future of petrophysical evaluation is moving towards increased efficiency, accuracy, and objectivity through smart automation.\n In this paper, we demonstrate the application of machine learning algorithms to automate well-log processing and interpretation of standard log measurements as well as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) using data acquired in one of the fields in Iraq. Standard logs such as density, sonic, neutron, gamma ray, etc are classified using machine learning (ML) algorithm into a set of classes that are converted to zones to drive petrophysical interpretation. This novel application of ML algorithm uses cross-entropy clustering (CEC), Gaussian mixture model (GMM), and Hidden Markov Model (HMM) which identifies locally stationary zones sharing similar statistical properties in logs, and then propagates zonation information from training wells to other wells. The training phase involves key wells which best represent the formation and associated heterogeneities to automatically generate classes (clusters), the resulting model is then used to reconstruct inputs and outputs with uncertainty and outlier flags for cross-checking and validation. The model is then applied to predict the same set of zones in the new wells that require interpretation and predict output curves. The main advantage is reducing the turnaround time of the interpretation and eliminating subjective inconsistencies often encountered with standard interpretation approaches.\n For multi-dimensional data such as NMR, several ML methods such as Parallel Analysis, Factor Analysis, and Cluster Analysis were applied to (a) determine the optimal number of modes to retain in the input NMR T2 distributions, these modes are the underlying poro-fluid constituents affecting NMR data over the entire interval b) decompose T2 distribution into these modes c) compute poro-fluid constituents volumes and cluster it into the same number of groups as the number of factors. This workflow helps to extract maximum information from multi-dimensional NMR data and eliminates the need for any a-priory assumptions, such as T2 cut-offs. We present the results of these methods applied to data acquired across the cretaceous successions in the south of Iraq to speed up the petrophysical analysis process, reduce analyst bias, and improve consistency results between one well to another within the same field.","PeriodicalId":349960,"journal":{"name":"Day 2 Tue, March 14, 2023","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 2 Tue, March 14, 2023","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/214055-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Well logs present a concise, in-depth representation of formation parameters. These logs allow interpreters to identify different rock types, distinguish porous from non-porous rocks, and quickly identify pay zones in subsurface formations. The ability to interpret well logs is largely dependent on the interpreter's ability to recognize patterns, past experiences, and knowledge of each measurement. Traditionally, logs were manually corrected for anomalies and normalized at the field scale, which is a time-consuming and often subjective approach. This is especially true for mature fields where log data has been collected from multiple sources. However, the future of petrophysical evaluation is moving towards increased efficiency, accuracy, and objectivity through smart automation. In this paper, we demonstrate the application of machine learning algorithms to automate well-log processing and interpretation of standard log measurements as well as nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) using data acquired in one of the fields in Iraq. Standard logs such as density, sonic, neutron, gamma ray, etc are classified using machine learning (ML) algorithm into a set of classes that are converted to zones to drive petrophysical interpretation. This novel application of ML algorithm uses cross-entropy clustering (CEC), Gaussian mixture model (GMM), and Hidden Markov Model (HMM) which identifies locally stationary zones sharing similar statistical properties in logs, and then propagates zonation information from training wells to other wells. The training phase involves key wells which best represent the formation and associated heterogeneities to automatically generate classes (clusters), the resulting model is then used to reconstruct inputs and outputs with uncertainty and outlier flags for cross-checking and validation. The model is then applied to predict the same set of zones in the new wells that require interpretation and predict output curves. The main advantage is reducing the turnaround time of the interpretation and eliminating subjective inconsistencies often encountered with standard interpretation approaches. For multi-dimensional data such as NMR, several ML methods such as Parallel Analysis, Factor Analysis, and Cluster Analysis were applied to (a) determine the optimal number of modes to retain in the input NMR T2 distributions, these modes are the underlying poro-fluid constituents affecting NMR data over the entire interval b) decompose T2 distribution into these modes c) compute poro-fluid constituents volumes and cluster it into the same number of groups as the number of factors. This workflow helps to extract maximum information from multi-dimensional NMR data and eliminates the need for any a-priory assumptions, such as T2 cut-offs. We present the results of these methods applied to data acquired across the cretaceous successions in the south of Iraq to speed up the petrophysical analysis process, reduce analyst bias, and improve consistency results between one well to another within the same field.
通过机器学习实现自动测井解释
测井资料能够简洁、深入地反映地层参数。这些测井资料使解释人员能够识别不同的岩石类型,区分多孔和非多孔岩石,并快速识别地下地层的产油层。测井解释的能力在很大程度上取决于解释人员识别模式、过去经验和每次测量知识的能力。传统上,测井是手动校正异常并在现场尺度上标准化的,这是一种耗时且往往主观的方法。对于从多个来源收集日志数据的成熟油田来说尤其如此。然而,通过智能自动化,岩石物理评价的未来正朝着提高效率、准确性和客观性的方向发展。在本文中,我们展示了机器学习算法在自动化测井处理和解释标准测井测量数据以及核磁共振(NMR)中的应用,这些数据来自伊拉克的一个油田。使用机器学习(ML)算法将密度、声波、中子、伽马射线等标准测井数据分类为一组类别,并将其转换为区域,以驱动岩石物理解释。这种ML算法的新应用使用交叉熵聚类(CEC)、高斯混合模型(GMM)和隐马尔可夫模型(HMM)来识别在测井曲线中具有相似统计属性的局部静止区域,然后将分区信息从训练井传播到其他井。训练阶段包括最能代表地层和相关异质性的关键井,以自动生成类(簇),然后使用生成的模型重建具有不确定性和离群标志的输入和输出,以进行交叉检查和验证。然后将该模型应用于需要解释和预测产量曲线的新井的同一层。其主要优点是减少了口译的周转时间,消除了标准口译方法经常遇到的主观不一致。对于核磁共振等多维数据,应用了并行分析、因子分析和聚类分析等几种ML方法(a)确定输入核磁共振T2分布中保留的最佳模式数量,这些模式是影响整个区间内核磁共振数据的潜在孔隙流体成分;b)将T2分布分解为这些模式;c)计算孔隙流体成分体积,并将其聚类成与因子数量相同的组数。该工作流程有助于从多维核磁共振数据中提取最大信息,并消除了任何优先假设的需要,例如T2截止值。我们将这些方法应用于伊拉克南部白垩纪地层的数据,以加快岩石物理分析过程,减少分析人员的偏差,并提高同一油田内井间结果的一致性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信