Plant-Derived Carbon Sources for Anaerobic Soil Disinfestation in Southern California

O. Daugovish, J. Muramoto, C. Shennan, M. Zavatta
{"title":"Plant-Derived Carbon Sources for Anaerobic Soil Disinfestation in Southern California","authors":"O. Daugovish, J. Muramoto, C. Shennan, M. Zavatta","doi":"10.15377/2409-9813.2021.08.13","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD) has been optimized and adopted as an organic alternative to chemical fumigation by strawberry growers in California. The ASD process relies on mixing labile carbon sources into the soil to generate chemical, physical, and microbiological changes aiding suppression of the soil-borne pathogens and enhancing fruit production. Continued ASD adoption is hindered by the increasing cost of rice bran, currently the most widely used carbon source. To address this need and to find suitable and economical alternative carbon sources, we conducted field evaluations of locally produced or sourced plant-based products. ASD with incorporated grass-sod clippings spent grain and coffee grounds from one supplier provided a 47% to 83% increase in fruit yields compared to untreated soil, but coffee grounds from a different supplier decreased strawberry yields. Carbon, nitrogen, and their ratios had important impacts on the efficacy of ASD with coffee grounds and grape pomace. ASD with wheat midds at 20 t/ha provided strawberry yields similar to chloropicrin-fumigated soil while substituting 30% of rice bran carbon rate with on-site grown cereal cover crop biomass resulted in yields similar to the full rate of rice bran but at a reduced cost. As we continue exploring cost-effective methods of soil disinfestation, we utilize ASD integrated with other pest management tools, such as the use of resistant cultivars and crop rotation for sustainable production.","PeriodicalId":356623,"journal":{"name":"Global Journal of Agricultural Innovation, Research & Development","volume":"141 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Journal of Agricultural Innovation, Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9813.2021.08.13","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Anaerobic soil disinfestation (ASD) has been optimized and adopted as an organic alternative to chemical fumigation by strawberry growers in California. The ASD process relies on mixing labile carbon sources into the soil to generate chemical, physical, and microbiological changes aiding suppression of the soil-borne pathogens and enhancing fruit production. Continued ASD adoption is hindered by the increasing cost of rice bran, currently the most widely used carbon source. To address this need and to find suitable and economical alternative carbon sources, we conducted field evaluations of locally produced or sourced plant-based products. ASD with incorporated grass-sod clippings spent grain and coffee grounds from one supplier provided a 47% to 83% increase in fruit yields compared to untreated soil, but coffee grounds from a different supplier decreased strawberry yields. Carbon, nitrogen, and their ratios had important impacts on the efficacy of ASD with coffee grounds and grape pomace. ASD with wheat midds at 20 t/ha provided strawberry yields similar to chloropicrin-fumigated soil while substituting 30% of rice bran carbon rate with on-site grown cereal cover crop biomass resulted in yields similar to the full rate of rice bran but at a reduced cost. As we continue exploring cost-effective methods of soil disinfestation, we utilize ASD integrated with other pest management tools, such as the use of resistant cultivars and crop rotation for sustainable production.
植物碳源在南加州厌氧土壤消毒中的应用
厌氧土壤除害(ASD)作为化学熏蒸的有机替代品,已被加州草莓种植者优化采用。ASD过程依赖于将不稳定的碳源混合到土壤中,以产生化学、物理和微生物变化,从而抑制土壤传播的病原体并提高果实产量。米糠是目前使用最广泛的碳源,其成本不断上升阻碍了ASD的持续采用。为了满足这一需求并寻找合适和经济的替代碳源,我们对当地生产或采购的植物性产品进行了实地评估。与未经处理的土壤相比,将一个供应商提供的草皮屑、废谷物和咖啡渣混合在ASD土壤中的水果产量增加了47%至83%,但来自另一个供应商的咖啡渣却降低了草莓产量。碳、氮及其配比对咖啡渣和葡萄渣防治ASD的效果有重要影响。用20吨/公顷的小麦种子进行ASD处理,草莓产量与氯仿熏蒸土壤相似,而用现场种植的谷物覆盖作物生物量代替30%的米糠碳含量,产量与米糠碳含量相近,但成本较低。随着我们继续探索具有成本效益的土壤除害方法,我们将ASD与其他害虫管理工具相结合,例如使用抗性品种和作物轮作以实现可持续生产。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信