Cosmic Noise Absorption Characteristics during the Impulse-Induced Supersubstorm of 21st January 2005

Shipra Sinha, G. Vichare, A. Sinha, R. Rawat, Gopi Seemala, S. Gokani, H. Frey, A. Kero
{"title":"Cosmic Noise Absorption Characteristics during the Impulse-Induced Supersubstorm of 21st January 2005","authors":"Shipra Sinha, G. Vichare, A. Sinha, R. Rawat, Gopi Seemala, S. Gokani, H. Frey, A. Kero","doi":"10.23919/URSIGASS51995.2021.9560256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The impulse-induced super substorm of 21st January 2005 has been reported by Hajra and Tsurutani (2018) and they have discussed the abnormal morphology of the auroral dynamics mainly examining the auroral images and currents. This event is revisited here with additional datasets of global Cosmic Noise Absorption (CNA) by Riometers, auroral images by a space-based Imager, plasma flux data from geostationary satellites and magnetic field measurements of ground stations covering almost all latitudinal and local time sectors. We have observed some peculiar characteristics of this event: (1) No southward component of IMF Bz prior to the substorm onset. (2) Westward electrojet current peaks in the dawn sector, and not in the midnight sector, during the substorm interval. (3) Presence of dayside shock-auroras: The electron & proton auroras are stronger in the pre and post-midnight sectors and strongest on the dayside. (4) The time of CNA onset and substorm onset coincide in the narrow belt of magnetic latitude near 65°. The time delay between these two increases away from this belt on both-poleward and equatorward latitudes. The delay is small (~ 2 minutes) on the dayside and significant (~11 minutes) on the night side. (5) The percentage of CNA is found to vary with MLT as well as with latitudes. CNA absorption is lowest on the dayside (~20%) whereas near dawn and dusk the percentage of CNA is nearly equal (~40-50%). (6) Considering the model proposed by Sorathia et al. (2019) we can say that the dawn-dusk symmetry observed in the CNA indicates the entry of particles from the flanks facilitated by Kelvin-Helmholtz instability.","PeriodicalId":152047,"journal":{"name":"2021 XXXIVth General Assembly and Scientific Symposium of the International Union of Radio Science (URSI GASS)","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 XXXIVth General Assembly and Scientific Symposium of the International Union of Radio Science (URSI GASS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23919/URSIGASS51995.2021.9560256","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The impulse-induced super substorm of 21st January 2005 has been reported by Hajra and Tsurutani (2018) and they have discussed the abnormal morphology of the auroral dynamics mainly examining the auroral images and currents. This event is revisited here with additional datasets of global Cosmic Noise Absorption (CNA) by Riometers, auroral images by a space-based Imager, plasma flux data from geostationary satellites and magnetic field measurements of ground stations covering almost all latitudinal and local time sectors. We have observed some peculiar characteristics of this event: (1) No southward component of IMF Bz prior to the substorm onset. (2) Westward electrojet current peaks in the dawn sector, and not in the midnight sector, during the substorm interval. (3) Presence of dayside shock-auroras: The electron & proton auroras are stronger in the pre and post-midnight sectors and strongest on the dayside. (4) The time of CNA onset and substorm onset coincide in the narrow belt of magnetic latitude near 65°. The time delay between these two increases away from this belt on both-poleward and equatorward latitudes. The delay is small (~ 2 minutes) on the dayside and significant (~11 minutes) on the night side. (5) The percentage of CNA is found to vary with MLT as well as with latitudes. CNA absorption is lowest on the dayside (~20%) whereas near dawn and dusk the percentage of CNA is nearly equal (~40-50%). (6) Considering the model proposed by Sorathia et al. (2019) we can say that the dawn-dusk symmetry observed in the CNA indicates the entry of particles from the flanks facilitated by Kelvin-Helmholtz instability.
2005年1月21日脉冲诱发的超级亚暴期间的宇宙噪声吸收特征
Hajra和Tsurutani(2018)报道了2005年1月21日的脉冲诱发超级亚暴,他们主要通过极光图像和极光流讨论了极光动力学的异常形态。这里用riometer的全球宇宙噪声吸收(CNA)数据集、天基成像仪的极光图像、地球静止卫星的等离子体通量数据和地面站的磁场测量数据重新回顾了这一事件,这些数据几乎涵盖了所有纬度和当地时间扇区。我们观察到这次事件的一些特殊特征:(1)在次暴开始之前,IMF Bz没有南向分量。(2)西向电喷流在次暴间歇期的黎明扇区出现峰值,而在午夜扇区无峰值。(3)日侧激波极光的存在:电子和质子极光在午夜前后较强,在日侧最强。(4)在磁纬65°附近的窄带中,CNA的发生时间与次暴的发生时间重合。这两者之间的时间延迟在远离这个带的两极和赤道纬度上都有所增加。这种延迟在昼侧很小(约2分钟),在夜侧很明显(约11分钟)。(5) CNA的百分比随MLT和纬度的变化而变化。白天的CNA吸收率最低(~20%),而接近黎明和黄昏时的CNA吸收率几乎相等(~40-50%)。(6)考虑到Sorathia等人(2019)提出的模型,我们可以说,在CNA中观察到的黎明-黄昏对称性表明,在开尔文-亥姆霍兹不稳定性的促进下,粒子从侧面进入。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信