Political Theory and Jurisprudence in Gentili's De Iure Belli: The Great Debate between 'Theological' and 'Humanist' Perspectives from Vitoria to Grotius

Jurisprudence & Legal Philosophy Pub Date : 1900-01-01 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.871754

D. Panizza

引用次数: 15

Abstract

Summary: 1) Introduction; 2) War as duel vs. war as execution of justice; 3) Bilateral justice of war vs. invincible ignorance; 4) Pre-emptive self-defence vs. necessary self-defence; 5) The making of peace: restitution-punishment vs. conquest-empire; 6) Civilization vs. barbarism and the common law of mankind; and 7) Conclusion.

查看原文本刊更多论文

真蒂利的政治理论和法理学:从维多利亚到格劳秀斯的“神学”和“人文主义”观点之间的大辩论

摘要:1)引言;2)作为决斗的战争与作为正义执行的战争;3)战争的双边正义vs.不可战胜的无知;4)先发制人的自卫与必要的自卫;5)和平的建立:恢复-惩罚vs.征服-帝国;6)文明与野蛮与人类的共同法则;7)结束语。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Jurisprudence & Legal Philosophy

自引率

0.00%

发文量