A stake in cyberspace

EW 7 Pub Date : 1996-09-09 DOI:10.1145/504450.504466
T. Kindberg
{"title":"A stake in cyberspace","authors":"T. Kindberg","doi":"10.1145/504450.504466","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Consider the information 'terrain' in which we browse and interact over the Internet, principally the World Wide Web but also USENET, email and IRC. This differs in several basic ways from the territory that we are used to: We can be - and often want to be - in several places at once. The information terrain is hard to navigate. It is infinite and heterogeneous. There are only rudimentary maps. It is in a state of flux, and is not sharply distinguished from the artifacts it sustains. Currently we spend most of our time wandering alone where there is much evidence of human activity, but where the natives themselves and their tools are nowhere to be seen. When we do encounter others, we pass low-bandwidth messages back and forth, often knowing little about our interlocutors.The thesis of this position paper is: The most useful notion of the terrain is the combination of users and the shared information that they interact with, not the information alone. Information is where users should be able to encounter other users with similar interests. We need to support collaboration and other forms of social interaction between users, who either meet while browsing information or who are already members of a group. The key to collaborative information sharing and interaction on the Internet is the concept of boundary, which encompasses naming, security and integrity of shared data, and user communication and awareness. The navigation problem will not go away, but boundaries enable us to impose structure on the sprawl.We now present an early snapshot of a design that addresses these points.","PeriodicalId":137590,"journal":{"name":"EW 7","volume":"16 16","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-09-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EW 7","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/504450.504466","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Consider the information 'terrain' in which we browse and interact over the Internet, principally the World Wide Web but also USENET, email and IRC. This differs in several basic ways from the territory that we are used to: We can be - and often want to be - in several places at once. The information terrain is hard to navigate. It is infinite and heterogeneous. There are only rudimentary maps. It is in a state of flux, and is not sharply distinguished from the artifacts it sustains. Currently we spend most of our time wandering alone where there is much evidence of human activity, but where the natives themselves and their tools are nowhere to be seen. When we do encounter others, we pass low-bandwidth messages back and forth, often knowing little about our interlocutors.The thesis of this position paper is: The most useful notion of the terrain is the combination of users and the shared information that they interact with, not the information alone. Information is where users should be able to encounter other users with similar interests. We need to support collaboration and other forms of social interaction between users, who either meet while browsing information or who are already members of a group. The key to collaborative information sharing and interaction on the Internet is the concept of boundary, which encompasses naming, security and integrity of shared data, and user communication and awareness. The navigation problem will not go away, but boundaries enable us to impose structure on the sprawl.We now present an early snapshot of a design that addresses these points.
网络空间的利益
考虑一下我们在互联网上浏览和互动的信息“地形”,主要是万维网,还有USENET、电子邮件和IRC。这与我们习惯的领域在几个基本方面有所不同:我们可以——而且经常想要——同时出现在几个地方。信息领域很难驾驭。它是无限的和异构的。只有基本的地图。它处于不断变化的状态,与它所维持的人工制品并没有明显的区别。目前,我们大部分时间都在独自徘徊,那里有很多人类活动的证据,但当地人自己和他们的工具却无处可见。当我们遇到其他人时,我们来回传递低带宽的信息,通常对我们的对话者知之甚少。这篇意见书的主题是:地形最有用的概念是用户和与他们交互的共享信息的组合,而不是单独的信息。信息是用户应该能够遇到具有相似兴趣的其他用户的地方。我们需要支持用户之间的协作和其他形式的社交互动,这些用户要么是在浏览信息时遇到的,要么是已经是一个组的成员。互联网上协同信息共享与交互的关键是边界的概念,它包括命名、共享数据的安全性和完整性以及用户的通信和感知。导航问题不会消失,但边界使我们能够在扩张中施加结构。现在我们展示了解决这些问题的设计的早期快照。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信