{"title":"A Critical Juncture: “Later” Latin Literature, the Newest Late Antiquity, and the Period of the Western Classic","authors":"M. Vessey, M. Vessey","doi":"10.21825/jolcel.81974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the appearance in 2020 of a long-awaited second “late antique” instalment of the Handbuch der lateinischen Literatur der Antike (Munich: C.H. Beck, 1989– ) and a new, collaborative Cambridge History of Later Latin Literature now at an advanced stage of preparation, there is an opportunity to re-evaluate the possibilities of scholarship in this field. What relation does such “literary” research bear to current, globalizing styles in late antique and first-millennial historical and cultural studies? What is likely to be the impact on it of current trends in the study of classical reception and intertextuality? This essay attempts a preliminary framing of the issues with reference to a largely discredited but still powerful model of the western literary classic, while arguing for hermeneutical continuity between the breakthrough work of Peter Brown’s half-century-old World of Late Antiquity (1971) and the critical-historical role of later ancient (Latin) literary studies.","PeriodicalId":237189,"journal":{"name":"Classics and Canonicity","volume":"4 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Classics and Canonicity","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21825/jolcel.81974","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
With the appearance in 2020 of a long-awaited second “late antique” instalment of the Handbuch der lateinischen Literatur der Antike (Munich: C.H. Beck, 1989– ) and a new, collaborative Cambridge History of Later Latin Literature now at an advanced stage of preparation, there is an opportunity to re-evaluate the possibilities of scholarship in this field. What relation does such “literary” research bear to current, globalizing styles in late antique and first-millennial historical and cultural studies? What is likely to be the impact on it of current trends in the study of classical reception and intertextuality? This essay attempts a preliminary framing of the issues with reference to a largely discredited but still powerful model of the western literary classic, while arguing for hermeneutical continuity between the breakthrough work of Peter Brown’s half-century-old World of Late Antiquity (1971) and the critical-historical role of later ancient (Latin) literary studies.
随着期待已久的第二部“晚期古董”版《安提克晚期文学手册》(慕尼黑:C.H. Beck, 1989 -)于2020年面世,以及一部新的、合作出版的《剑桥晚期拉丁文学史》(Cambridge History of late Latin Literature)目前正处于准备的后期阶段,我们有机会重新评估这一领域学术研究的可能性。这种“文学”研究与古代晚期和千年前的历史文化研究中当前全球化的风格有什么关系?经典接受和互文性研究的当前趋势可能对它产生什么影响?本文试图通过参考西方文学经典的一个很大程度上不可信但仍然强大的模型来初步构建这些问题,同时争论彼得·布朗半个世纪前的突破性作品《晚期古代世界》(1971)与后来古代(拉丁)文学研究的关键历史作用之间的解释学连续性。