Alcohol policies and impaired driving in the United States: Effects of driving- vs. drinking-oriented policies.

Z. Xuan, Jason G. Blanchette, T. Nelson, T. Heeren, T. Nguyen, T. Naimi
{"title":"Alcohol policies and impaired driving in the United States: Effects of driving- vs. drinking-oriented policies.","authors":"Z. Xuan, Jason G. Blanchette, T. Nelson, T. Heeren, T. Nguyen, T. Naimi","doi":"10.7895/IJADR.V4I2.205","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AIMS\nTo test the hypotheses that stronger policy environments are associated with less impaired driving and that driving-oriented and drinking-oriented policy subgroups are independently associated with impaired driving.\n\n\nDESIGN\nState-level data on 29 policies in 50 states from 2001-2009 were used as lagged exposures in generalized linear regression models to predict self-reported impaired driving.\n\n\nSETTING\nFifty United States and Washington, D.C.\n\n\nPARTICIPANTS\nA total of 1,292,245 adults (≥ 18 years old) biennially from 2002-2010.\n\n\nMEASURES\nAlcohol Policy Scale scores representing the alcohol policy environment were created by summing policies weighted by their efficacy and degree of implementation by state-year. Past-30-day alcohol-impaired driving from 2002-2010 was obtained from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys.\n\n\nFINDINGS\nHigher Alcohol Policy Scale scores are strongly associated with lower state-level prevalence and individual-level risk of impaired driving. After accounting for driving-oriented policies, drinking-oriented policies had a robust independent association with reduced likelihood of impaired driving. Reduced binge drinking mediates the relationship between drinking-oriented policies and impaired driving, and driving-oriented policies reduce the likelihood of impaired driving among binge drinkers.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nEfforts to reduce alcohol-impaired driving should focus on reducing excessive drinking in addition to preventing driving among those who are impaired.","PeriodicalId":162336,"journal":{"name":"The International Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research","volume":"15 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The International Journal of Alcohol and Drug Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7895/IJADR.V4I2.205","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

AIMS To test the hypotheses that stronger policy environments are associated with less impaired driving and that driving-oriented and drinking-oriented policy subgroups are independently associated with impaired driving. DESIGN State-level data on 29 policies in 50 states from 2001-2009 were used as lagged exposures in generalized linear regression models to predict self-reported impaired driving. SETTING Fifty United States and Washington, D.C. PARTICIPANTS A total of 1,292,245 adults (≥ 18 years old) biennially from 2002-2010. MEASURES Alcohol Policy Scale scores representing the alcohol policy environment were created by summing policies weighted by their efficacy and degree of implementation by state-year. Past-30-day alcohol-impaired driving from 2002-2010 was obtained from the Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System surveys. FINDINGS Higher Alcohol Policy Scale scores are strongly associated with lower state-level prevalence and individual-level risk of impaired driving. After accounting for driving-oriented policies, drinking-oriented policies had a robust independent association with reduced likelihood of impaired driving. Reduced binge drinking mediates the relationship between drinking-oriented policies and impaired driving, and driving-oriented policies reduce the likelihood of impaired driving among binge drinkers. CONCLUSIONS Efforts to reduce alcohol-impaired driving should focus on reducing excessive drinking in addition to preventing driving among those who are impaired.
美国的酒精政策和驾驶障碍:驾驶导向与饮酒导向政策的影响。
目的验证以下假设:较强的政策环境与较少的受损驾驶相关,以及以驾驶为导向和以饮酒为导向的政策子组与受损驾驶独立相关。设计50个州2001-2009年29项政策的州级数据作为滞后暴露在广义线性回归模型中,以预测自述的不良驾驶。在2002-2010年期间,50名美国和华盛顿特区的参与者共1,292,245名成人(≥18岁),每两年一次。测量方法酒精政策量表得分代表酒精政策环境,是通过对各州年度的政策有效性和执行程度加权的总和来创建的。2002年至2010年过去30天的酒后驾驶数据来自行为风险因素监测系统调查。研究发现:较高的酒精政策量表得分与较低的州一级患病率和个人水平的驾驶障碍风险密切相关。在考虑了以驾驶为导向的政策后,以饮酒为导向的政策与降低驾驶障碍的可能性有着强大的独立关联。减少狂饮在以饮酒为导向的政策和不良驾驶之间起中介作用,而以驾驶为导向的政策降低了酗酒者发生不良驾驶的可能性。结论减少酒后驾驶在预防酒后驾驶的基础上,应注重减少过度饮酒。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信