{"title":"Complexities of Core-Periphery Relation: an Analysis of the Late Raul Prebisch","authors":"Natalia Bracarense","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2870709","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The work of Raul Prebisch is typically summarized by two of his important contributions to development economics: the center-periphery paradigm together with his diagnosis of Latin America’s development struggles. Recent investigations have, however, shed light on the nature of Prebisch’s early work, especially his understanding of business cycles (Sember 2010; Perez and Vernengo 2012). Although the present paper focuses on his center and periphery, it examines Prebisch’s later work, casting a different light on his most enduring contribution to the field. While early in his career, Prebisch held a standard structuralist position by the 1960s, Prebisch embraced a less rigid understanding of the relationship between center and periphery, adding multiple layers to his analysis of the latter.","PeriodicalId":305946,"journal":{"name":"AARN: Economic Systems (Sub-Topic)","volume":"76 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-11-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AARN: Economic Systems (Sub-Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2870709","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
Abstract
The work of Raul Prebisch is typically summarized by two of his important contributions to development economics: the center-periphery paradigm together with his diagnosis of Latin America’s development struggles. Recent investigations have, however, shed light on the nature of Prebisch’s early work, especially his understanding of business cycles (Sember 2010; Perez and Vernengo 2012). Although the present paper focuses on his center and periphery, it examines Prebisch’s later work, casting a different light on his most enduring contribution to the field. While early in his career, Prebisch held a standard structuralist position by the 1960s, Prebisch embraced a less rigid understanding of the relationship between center and periphery, adding multiple layers to his analysis of the latter.
劳尔·普雷维什(Raul Prebisch)的工作通常由他对发展经济学的两个重要贡献来总结:中心-边缘范式以及他对拉丁美洲发展斗争的诊断。然而,最近的调查揭示了普雷维什早期工作的本质,尤其是他对商业周期的理解(2010年9月;Perez and Vernengo 2012)。虽然本文关注的是他的中心和外围,但它考察了普雷维什的后期工作,对他对该领域最持久的贡献投下了不同的光。在他职业生涯的早期,Prebisch在20世纪60年代持有标准的结构主义立场,Prebisch对中心和边缘之间的关系的理解不那么严格,对后者的分析增加了多层次。