Conceptualising Empowerment, Gender and Quota: The Implications of women’s Leadership Styles at Managerial Positions

L. Alhalwachi
{"title":"Conceptualising Empowerment, Gender and Quota: The Implications of women’s Leadership Styles at Managerial Positions","authors":"L. Alhalwachi","doi":"10.31270/IJAME/07/04/2018/04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Empowerment is a topic which has been subject to a considerable amount of debate in recent years. Not only is there discussion surrounding what empowerment means and encompasses (Cox et al. , 2006), there is also discussion as to how it should be applied effectively (Denham-Lincoln, 2002).  Research in this area indicates that numerous factors impact upon perceptions of empowerment, and it would appear that a combination of intrinsic and extrinsic factors influences the extent to which an individual perceives they are empowered, and even the way in which an individual perceives they are empowered (Cooney, 2004).  This work concentrates on perceptions of female empowerment in senior leadership roles and determines that the most critical factors influencing perceptions of female empowerment are derived from individual approaches to leadership and the extent to which a female is supported in their position.  Unfortunately, the research demonstrates that the actual situation facing female leaders in the workplace and the extent to which they are empowered is significantly less than the ideal state might wish.  Attempts to redress the balance have included discussions surrounding the use of quotas to help empower women (Colney, 2011), and also alternative forms of training and mentoring to help provide women with the necessary techniques and skills to achieve parity in the workplace.  Overall the research establishes that there is no single solution to the problem of empowerment.  This situation is exacerbated by the chasm between perception and reality, with acceptance of equality at surface level but the practical and factual evidence demonstrating significant levels of inequality.  At the close this discussion it is concluded that until these issues are discussed in open forums then it is unlikely that there will be any form of significant change. The research critically examined the effectiveness of possible alternative practical resolutions to improving female presence and representation in senior management levels and the boardroom, and investigated the effectiveness of quota as a proposed resolution to level the playing field in the business world.","PeriodicalId":119562,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Advances in Management and Economics","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Advances in Management and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31270/IJAME/07/04/2018/04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Empowerment is a topic which has been subject to a considerable amount of debate in recent years. Not only is there discussion surrounding what empowerment means and encompasses (Cox et al. , 2006), there is also discussion as to how it should be applied effectively (Denham-Lincoln, 2002).  Research in this area indicates that numerous factors impact upon perceptions of empowerment, and it would appear that a combination of intrinsic and extrinsic factors influences the extent to which an individual perceives they are empowered, and even the way in which an individual perceives they are empowered (Cooney, 2004).  This work concentrates on perceptions of female empowerment in senior leadership roles and determines that the most critical factors influencing perceptions of female empowerment are derived from individual approaches to leadership and the extent to which a female is supported in their position.  Unfortunately, the research demonstrates that the actual situation facing female leaders in the workplace and the extent to which they are empowered is significantly less than the ideal state might wish.  Attempts to redress the balance have included discussions surrounding the use of quotas to help empower women (Colney, 2011), and also alternative forms of training and mentoring to help provide women with the necessary techniques and skills to achieve parity in the workplace.  Overall the research establishes that there is no single solution to the problem of empowerment.  This situation is exacerbated by the chasm between perception and reality, with acceptance of equality at surface level but the practical and factual evidence demonstrating significant levels of inequality.  At the close this discussion it is concluded that until these issues are discussed in open forums then it is unlikely that there will be any form of significant change. The research critically examined the effectiveness of possible alternative practical resolutions to improving female presence and representation in senior management levels and the boardroom, and investigated the effectiveness of quota as a proposed resolution to level the playing field in the business world.
赋权、性别和配额的概念化:女性领导风格对管理职位的影响
近年来,赋权是一个备受争议的话题。不仅有关于授权意味着什么和包含什么的讨论(Cox et al., 2006),也有关于如何有效应用授权的讨论(Denham-Lincoln, 2002)。这一领域的研究表明,许多因素都会影响对赋权的认知,似乎内在因素和外在因素的结合会影响个人感知自己被赋权的程度,甚至影响个人感知自己被赋权的方式(库尼,2004年)。这项工作的重点是对高级领导角色中赋予女性权力的看法,并确定影响赋予女性权力的看法的最关键因素来自个人的领导方法和女性在其职位上得到支持的程度。不幸的是,研究表明,女性领导者在工作场所面临的实际情况以及她们被授权的程度远远低于理想状态。纠正这种平衡的尝试包括围绕使用配额来帮助赋予妇女权力的讨论(Colney, 2011),以及其他形式的培训和指导,以帮助为妇女提供必要的技术和技能,以实现工作场所的平等。总的来说,研究表明,赋权问题没有单一的解决方案。观念与现实之间的鸿沟加剧了这种情况,人们在表面上接受平等,但实际和事实证据表明存在严重的不平等。在本次讨论结束时,得出的结论是,在这些问题在公开论坛上讨论之前,不太可能有任何形式的重大变化。该研究严格审查了可能的替代实际解决方案的有效性,以提高女性在高级管理层和董事会中的存在和代表性,并调查了配额作为一项提议的解决方案在商业世界中公平竞争环境的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信