Digital Transformation, Servitization and Governmentality

Pierpaolo Testa
{"title":"Digital Transformation, Servitization and Governmentality","authors":"Pierpaolo Testa","doi":"10.54941/ahfe1003111","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is no doubt that the digital transformation is assuming some characteristic features: progressive digitization of the economy, increased relevance of digital platforms, progressive digitization of business models, disintermediation due to e-commerce, servitization of the value proposition and/or operating model, digital re-invention, spread of technoculture in consumer contexts, managerial automation due to algorithms and AI adoption, increased consumers’ brand experience, social engagement, big data analysis centrality, symbiotic value creation expectations at societal level.However, now very little is investigated the effect on governmentality (or the art of government) of these transformations. What role should the public system and actors play? In a first preliminary analysis it seems that this role could be confined but not limited to: 1. promoting a growing adoption of these transformations from all the economic system’s key players (firms, retailers, suppliers, technology vendors, Universities, research centers, consumers). 2. fostering networking for DT3. Financially supporting DT and disciplining it4. Protecting the SME promoting DT processes at an aggregate level (districts, supply chains, clusters, Regional Innovation Systems). 5. Digital transformation of public administration itself, permitting the same to evolve towards a systemic view of governmentality 6. Adoption of a digital service culture.The general aim of this article is to assess the main directions along which the digital transformation is affecting global economy, mainly under a twofold perspective. 1.A firm’s and managerial perspective, discussing the most relevant managerial topic emerging with the digital transformation and above listed. 2.A governmentality perspective, studying some calls launched by some of the most relevant European Countries (Italy, Germany, England, France) to investigate the main objectives and scopes of digital transformation under a public management eye. Primary and secondary sources of information will be integrated for achieve such a research purpose. The information borrowed from institutional calls will be integrated by media interpretations of the phenomenon under analysis. Reports on the digital transformation by leading consulting firms operating in the countries will be also analyzed.The contribution is conceptual and interpretive in nature.","PeriodicalId":380925,"journal":{"name":"The Human Side of Service Engineering","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Human Side of Service Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54941/ahfe1003111","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is no doubt that the digital transformation is assuming some characteristic features: progressive digitization of the economy, increased relevance of digital platforms, progressive digitization of business models, disintermediation due to e-commerce, servitization of the value proposition and/or operating model, digital re-invention, spread of technoculture in consumer contexts, managerial automation due to algorithms and AI adoption, increased consumers’ brand experience, social engagement, big data analysis centrality, symbiotic value creation expectations at societal level.However, now very little is investigated the effect on governmentality (or the art of government) of these transformations. What role should the public system and actors play? In a first preliminary analysis it seems that this role could be confined but not limited to: 1. promoting a growing adoption of these transformations from all the economic system’s key players (firms, retailers, suppliers, technology vendors, Universities, research centers, consumers). 2. fostering networking for DT3. Financially supporting DT and disciplining it4. Protecting the SME promoting DT processes at an aggregate level (districts, supply chains, clusters, Regional Innovation Systems). 5. Digital transformation of public administration itself, permitting the same to evolve towards a systemic view of governmentality 6. Adoption of a digital service culture.The general aim of this article is to assess the main directions along which the digital transformation is affecting global economy, mainly under a twofold perspective. 1.A firm’s and managerial perspective, discussing the most relevant managerial topic emerging with the digital transformation and above listed. 2.A governmentality perspective, studying some calls launched by some of the most relevant European Countries (Italy, Germany, England, France) to investigate the main objectives and scopes of digital transformation under a public management eye. Primary and secondary sources of information will be integrated for achieve such a research purpose. The information borrowed from institutional calls will be integrated by media interpretations of the phenomenon under analysis. Reports on the digital transformation by leading consulting firms operating in the countries will be also analyzed.The contribution is conceptual and interpretive in nature.
数字化转型、服务化和治理
毫无疑问,数字化转型正在呈现一些特征:经济的渐进式数字化、数字平台相关性的增强、商业模式的渐进式数字化、电子商务的去中介化、价值主张和/或运营模式的服务化、数字化再发明、技术文化在消费者环境中的传播、算法和人工智能采用带来的管理自动化、消费者品牌体验的增强、社会参与、大数据分析的中心性、社会层面的共生价值创造预期。然而,现在很少有人调查这些变革对治理(或政府艺术)的影响。公共系统和行动者应该发挥什么作用?初步分析表明,这一作用可以限于但不限于:1。促进所有经济系统的关键参与者(公司、零售商、供应商、技术供应商、大学、研究中心、消费者)越来越多地采用这些转变。2. 促进DT3的联网。在经济上支持和约束DT。保护中小企业,在整体层面(地区、供应链、集群、区域创新系统)促进创新流程。5. 公共行政本身的数字化转型,使其能够向系统化的治理观发展。采用数码服务文化。本文的总体目的是评估数字化转型影响全球经济的主要方向,主要是在双重视角下。1.一个公司和管理的角度,讨论与数字化转型和上面列出的最相关的管理主题。2.从治理的角度,研究一些最相关的欧洲国家(意大利、德国、英国、法国)发起的呼吁,以调查公共管理视角下数字化转型的主要目标和范围。为了达到这样的研究目的,将综合各种第一手和第二手资料来源。媒体对所分析现象的解释将结合从机构呼吁中借来的信息。还将分析在这些国家运营的领先咨询公司的数字化转型报告。这一贡献在本质上是概念性和解释性的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信