{"title":"The Extraterritorial Application of U.S. Securities Fraud Prohibitions in an Increasingly Global Transactional World","authors":"Joan Macleod Heminway","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2054135","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This draft working paper, prepared for a French academic forum entitled “American Law Today: Identity, Mutations, and Debate,” is a brief essay on the current and potential future extraterritorial reach of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 10b-5 adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission under Section 10(b). The essay does three principal things. First, it summarizes the key antifraud rules in context. Next, it describes (in brief) the history and current state of the academic and political debate on the extraterritoriality of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 (including commentary on the U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion in Morrison v. Nat’l Austl. Bank Ltd. and reactions to the recently released report of the Securities and Exchange Commission in compliance with Congress’s mandate under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act). Finally, before briefly concluding, the essay suggests a way forward for Congress in light of the current state of the extraterritoriality debate.The essay has a very simple general premise: that Congress should clarify the extraterritorial reach of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 and ground its rule firmly in applicable policy: namely, the protection of U.S. investors and markets.","PeriodicalId":305370,"journal":{"name":"University of Tennessee College of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-05-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Tennessee College of Law Legal Studies Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2054135","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This draft working paper, prepared for a French academic forum entitled “American Law Today: Identity, Mutations, and Debate,” is a brief essay on the current and potential future extraterritorial reach of Section 10(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Rule 10b-5 adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission under Section 10(b). The essay does three principal things. First, it summarizes the key antifraud rules in context. Next, it describes (in brief) the history and current state of the academic and political debate on the extraterritoriality of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 (including commentary on the U.S. Supreme Court’s opinion in Morrison v. Nat’l Austl. Bank Ltd. and reactions to the recently released report of the Securities and Exchange Commission in compliance with Congress’s mandate under the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act). Finally, before briefly concluding, the essay suggests a way forward for Congress in light of the current state of the extraterritoriality debate.The essay has a very simple general premise: that Congress should clarify the extraterritorial reach of Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 and ground its rule firmly in applicable policy: namely, the protection of U.S. investors and markets.
本工作文件草案是为一个名为“今日美国法律:身份、突变和辩论”的法国学术论坛准备的,是一篇关于1934年《证券交易法》第10(b)条和美国证券交易委员会根据第10(b)条采用的规则10b-5的当前和潜在未来治外法权范围的简短文章。这篇文章主要做了三件事。首先,总结了背景下的关键反欺诈规则。接下来,它(简要地)描述了关于第10(b)条和规则10b-5的治外法权的学术和政治辩论的历史和现状(包括对美国最高法院在Morrison v. Nat 'l Austl案中的意见的评论)。美国证券交易委员会(Securities and Exchange Commission)遵照国会《多德-弗兰克华尔街改革与消费者保护法》(Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act)的授权,最近发布了一份报告。最后,在简要总结之前,本文根据治外法权辩论的现状,为国会提出了一条前进的道路。这篇文章有一个非常简单的一般前提:国会应该澄清第10(b)条和第10b-5条的治外法权范围,并将其规则牢固地建立在适用政策上:即保护美国投资者和市场。