Disk scheduling revisited: can O(n2) algorithms compete?

ACM-SE 35 Pub Date : 1997-04-02 DOI:10.1145/2817460.2817473
R. Geist, R. Ross
{"title":"Disk scheduling revisited: can O(n2) algorithms compete?","authors":"R. Geist, R. Ross","doi":"10.1145/2817460.2817473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A simple O(n2) disk scheduling algorithm is suggested, and its performance on a real system, an Intel P6-based system running Linux 2.0.18, is compared with that of standard O(n) scheduling algorithms, with the aim of determining whether the large disparity between processor speeds and disk speeds might now allow for improved disk scheduling under heavy loads. The simple O(n2) algorithm is seen to provide some modest performance improvements over the best linear algorithms. The study also identifies several areas where potentially large additional performance improvements may be found by extending the framework suggested here.","PeriodicalId":274966,"journal":{"name":"ACM-SE 35","volume":"98 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1997-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM-SE 35","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2817460.2817473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

A simple O(n2) disk scheduling algorithm is suggested, and its performance on a real system, an Intel P6-based system running Linux 2.0.18, is compared with that of standard O(n) scheduling algorithms, with the aim of determining whether the large disparity between processor speeds and disk speeds might now allow for improved disk scheduling under heavy loads. The simple O(n2) algorithm is seen to provide some modest performance improvements over the best linear algorithms. The study also identifies several areas where potentially large additional performance improvements may be found by extending the framework suggested here.
重新审视磁盘调度:O(n2)算法可以竞争吗?
本文提出了一种简单的O(n2)磁盘调度算法,并将其在一个实际系统(一个运行Linux 2.0.18的基于Intel p6的系统)上的性能与标准O(n)调度算法进行了比较,目的是确定处理器速度和磁盘速度之间的巨大差异现在是否允许在高负载下改进磁盘调度。与最好的线性算法相比,简单的O(n2)算法提供了一些适度的性能改进。该研究还确定了几个领域,通过扩展这里建议的框架,可能会发现潜在的巨大的额外性能改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信