Model-transformation-based computational design synthesis for mission architecture optimization

S. Herzig, S. Mandutianu, Hongman Kim, S. Hernandez, T. Imken
{"title":"Model-transformation-based computational design synthesis for mission architecture optimization","authors":"S. Herzig, S. Mandutianu, Hongman Kim, S. Hernandez, T. Imken","doi":"10.1109/AERO.2017.7943953","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper, a model-based approach to exploring the trade space of multi-spacecraft mission architectures is introduced. Missions involving multiple spacecraft are inherently more complex to design than traditional single spacecraft missions. This is particularly true for fractionated mission concepts, where spacecraft have diverse roles and distributed responsibilities, and fulfilling mission goals requires communication and collaboration. In practice, this complexity and the lack of computational models and tools limit design teams to consider small design spaces and force them to quickly fixate on a single mission design. However, design fixation at such early stages often leads to sub-optimal designs. Towards overcoming this limitation, we propose an automated approach to exploring and visualizing the trade space of multi-spacecraft mission architectures that aids users in decision making, and provides a basis for identifying solutions that are Pareto-optimal with respect to user-defined science requirements, technical and resource constraints, and mission objectives. Central to our approach is the automated synthesis and analysis of mission architecture alternatives from a set of user-provided functional requirements and mission goals, as well as a library of spacecraft components and analysis models. Design rules (synthesis knowledge) are provided in the form of model-transformation rules. Sequences of endogenous model transformations are applied in-place to produce sets of candidate solutions, thereby effectively searching the design space. The search process is guided by the specified objectives, and is implemented using evolutionary algorithms. We demonstrate our approach to architectural optimization using a simplified radio interferometry mission design as a case study. We conclude that using the proposed approach, the number and diversity of candidate mission architectures available for consideration can be significantly increased. Furthermore, the automated synthesis and evaluation of mission architectures can lead to emergent and non-intuitive solutions to be discovered.","PeriodicalId":224475,"journal":{"name":"2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference","volume":"33 22","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2017 IEEE Aerospace Conference","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/AERO.2017.7943953","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19

Abstract

In this paper, a model-based approach to exploring the trade space of multi-spacecraft mission architectures is introduced. Missions involving multiple spacecraft are inherently more complex to design than traditional single spacecraft missions. This is particularly true for fractionated mission concepts, where spacecraft have diverse roles and distributed responsibilities, and fulfilling mission goals requires communication and collaboration. In practice, this complexity and the lack of computational models and tools limit design teams to consider small design spaces and force them to quickly fixate on a single mission design. However, design fixation at such early stages often leads to sub-optimal designs. Towards overcoming this limitation, we propose an automated approach to exploring and visualizing the trade space of multi-spacecraft mission architectures that aids users in decision making, and provides a basis for identifying solutions that are Pareto-optimal with respect to user-defined science requirements, technical and resource constraints, and mission objectives. Central to our approach is the automated synthesis and analysis of mission architecture alternatives from a set of user-provided functional requirements and mission goals, as well as a library of spacecraft components and analysis models. Design rules (synthesis knowledge) are provided in the form of model-transformation rules. Sequences of endogenous model transformations are applied in-place to produce sets of candidate solutions, thereby effectively searching the design space. The search process is guided by the specified objectives, and is implemented using evolutionary algorithms. We demonstrate our approach to architectural optimization using a simplified radio interferometry mission design as a case study. We conclude that using the proposed approach, the number and diversity of candidate mission architectures available for consideration can be significantly increased. Furthermore, the automated synthesis and evaluation of mission architectures can lead to emergent and non-intuitive solutions to be discovered.
基于模型变换的任务架构优化计算设计综合
本文介绍了一种基于模型的多航天器任务体系结构贸易空间探索方法。与传统的单航天器任务相比,多航天器任务的设计本身就更加复杂。这对于分散任务概念尤其如此,其中航天器具有不同的角色和分散的责任,并且实现任务目标需要沟通和协作。在实践中,这种复杂性和缺乏计算模型和工具限制了设计团队考虑小型设计空间,并迫使他们快速专注于单个任务设计。然而,设计固定在这样的早期阶段往往导致次优设计。为了克服这一限制,我们提出了一种自动化的方法来探索和可视化多航天器任务架构的贸易空间,帮助用户进行决策,并为识别用户定义的科学需求、技术和资源约束以及任务目标方面的帕累托最优解决方案提供了基础。我们方法的核心是从一组用户提供的功能需求和任务目标中自动合成和分析任务架构备选方案,以及航天器组件和分析模型库。设计规则(综合知识)以模型转换规则的形式提供。就地应用内生模型转换序列来产生候选解集,从而有效地搜索设计空间。搜索过程由指定的目标引导,并使用进化算法实现。我们用一个简化的无线电干涉测量任务设计作为案例研究来展示我们的架构优化方法。我们得出的结论是,使用所提出的方法,可供考虑的候选任务架构的数量和多样性可以显着增加。此外,任务架构的自动化综合和评估可能导致发现紧急和非直观的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信