The International legal framework for countering International crimes in Afghanistan

O. Bazov
{"title":"The International legal framework for countering International crimes in Afghanistan","authors":"O. Bazov","doi":"10.37749/2308-9636-2021-7(223)-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the international legal framework for combating international crimes in Afghanistan. The issues of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court in relation to the prosecution and prosecution of persons who have committed or ordered to commit war crimes, crimes against humanity and terrorist acts in a given country are analyzed. Attention is drawn to the organizational problems in the activities of the International Criminal Court in connection with the application of sanctions against judges and the prosecutor of this court.\n\nThe situation with the perpetration of mass international crimes in Afghanistan and the need to bring to justice the perpetrators who killed or injured thousands of civilians in Afghanistan cannot but be alarmed by the international community, which sees the events in Afghanistan as a threat to peace and international security.\n\nAs there is no effective domestic justice system for prosecuting international crimes in Afghanistan, the International Criminal Court is the most effective legal mechanism for prosecuting international criminals for committing war and other international crimes in Afghanistan. There are all the necessary preconditions for this – both the fact that the International Criminal Court, taking into account the principle of complementarity, has the necessary jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute individuals for committing international crimes, which were probably committed in Afghanistan, and that Afghanistan is a State party to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and, accordingly, recognizes the jurisdiction of that court. At the same time, Afghanistan’s legal relations with the International Criminal Court in the field of combating international crimes must be carried out in accordance with international law, taking into account the principle of complementarity.\n\nKey words: international court, international crimes, jurisdiction, sanctions, responsibility.","PeriodicalId":171899,"journal":{"name":"Legal Ukraine","volume":"628 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Ukraine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37749/2308-9636-2021-7(223)-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the international legal framework for combating international crimes in Afghanistan. The issues of the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court in relation to the prosecution and prosecution of persons who have committed or ordered to commit war crimes, crimes against humanity and terrorist acts in a given country are analyzed. Attention is drawn to the organizational problems in the activities of the International Criminal Court in connection with the application of sanctions against judges and the prosecutor of this court. The situation with the perpetration of mass international crimes in Afghanistan and the need to bring to justice the perpetrators who killed or injured thousands of civilians in Afghanistan cannot but be alarmed by the international community, which sees the events in Afghanistan as a threat to peace and international security. As there is no effective domestic justice system for prosecuting international crimes in Afghanistan, the International Criminal Court is the most effective legal mechanism for prosecuting international criminals for committing war and other international crimes in Afghanistan. There are all the necessary preconditions for this – both the fact that the International Criminal Court, taking into account the principle of complementarity, has the necessary jurisdiction to investigate and prosecute individuals for committing international crimes, which were probably committed in Afghanistan, and that Afghanistan is a State party to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court and, accordingly, recognizes the jurisdiction of that court. At the same time, Afghanistan’s legal relations with the International Criminal Court in the field of combating international crimes must be carried out in accordance with international law, taking into account the principle of complementarity. Key words: international court, international crimes, jurisdiction, sanctions, responsibility.
打击阿富汗境内国际犯罪的国际法律框架
本文探讨了在阿富汗打击国际犯罪的国际法律框架。分析了国际刑事法院在起诉和起诉在某一国家犯下或下令犯下战争罪、危害人类罪和恐怖主义行为的人方面的管辖权问题。委员会提请注意国际刑事法院活动中与对该法院法官和检察官实施制裁有关的组织问题。在阿富汗犯下大规模国际罪行的局势以及将杀害或伤害阿富汗数以千计平民的肇事者绳之以法的必要性不能不使国际社会感到震惊,因为国际社会认为阿富汗发生的事件是对和平与国际安全的威胁。由于在阿富汗没有起诉国际罪行的有效的国内司法制度,国际刑事法院是起诉在阿富汗犯下战争罪和其他国际罪行的国际罪犯的最有效的法律机制。这方面有一切必要的先决条件- -国际刑事法院在考虑到互补原则的情况下,具有调查和起诉可能在阿富汗犯下国际罪行的个人的必要管辖权,而且阿富汗是《国际刑事法院罗马规约》的缔约国,因此承认该法院的管辖权。与此同时,阿富汗与国际刑事法院在打击国际罪行方面的法律关系必须按照国际法进行,并考虑到相辅相成的原则。关键词:国际法院,国际犯罪,管辖权,制裁,责任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信