The design and analysis of parallel algorithms

C. Rodríguez
{"title":"The design and analysis of parallel algorithms","authors":"C. Rodríguez","doi":"10.1109/EMPDP.2002.994219","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"omputing Models provide frames for the analysis and design of algorithms. Unfortunately, the balance required between simplicity and realism makes it difficult to guarantee the necessary accuracy for the whole range of algorithms and machines. Simplicity implies a minimal number of architecture parameters (usually including computational power, bandwidth and latency). Accuracy implies just the opposite. The short history of Parallel Computing has seen the arrival (and the departure) of many proposals. Undoubtedly, the best known among those is the Parallel Random Access Machine (PRAM), the Postal/LogP Model and the Bulk Synchronous Parallel Model (BSP). From these three, the oldest one, the PRAM model, has been discarded as unrealistic. The other two, LogP and BSP, remain but do not escape of those aforementioned conflicts. Each model enforces/matches a different parallel programming style. To make the situation worse, none of these two styles agrees completely with the currently dominant style in parallel and distributed programming: MPI message passing. The talk will make emphasis on BSP, its weakness and strengths. As developing examples, we will use two programming paradigms: nested data parallelism and pipelining. C","PeriodicalId":126071,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings 10th Euromicro Workshop on Parallel, Distributed and Network-based Processing","volume":"84 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings 10th Euromicro Workshop on Parallel, Distributed and Network-based Processing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/EMPDP.2002.994219","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

omputing Models provide frames for the analysis and design of algorithms. Unfortunately, the balance required between simplicity and realism makes it difficult to guarantee the necessary accuracy for the whole range of algorithms and machines. Simplicity implies a minimal number of architecture parameters (usually including computational power, bandwidth and latency). Accuracy implies just the opposite. The short history of Parallel Computing has seen the arrival (and the departure) of many proposals. Undoubtedly, the best known among those is the Parallel Random Access Machine (PRAM), the Postal/LogP Model and the Bulk Synchronous Parallel Model (BSP). From these three, the oldest one, the PRAM model, has been discarded as unrealistic. The other two, LogP and BSP, remain but do not escape of those aforementioned conflicts. Each model enforces/matches a different parallel programming style. To make the situation worse, none of these two styles agrees completely with the currently dominant style in parallel and distributed programming: MPI message passing. The talk will make emphasis on BSP, its weakness and strengths. As developing examples, we will use two programming paradigms: nested data parallelism and pipelining. C
并行算法的设计与分析
计算模型为算法的分析和设计提供了框架。不幸的是,在简单性和现实性之间的平衡使得很难保证所有算法和机器的必要准确性。简单意味着最少数量的架构参数(通常包括计算能力、带宽和延迟)。准确意味着恰恰相反。并行计算的短暂历史见证了许多提议的到来(和离开)。毫无疑问,其中最著名的是并行随机存取机(PRAM)、邮政/LogP模型和批量同步并行模型(BSP)。在这三种模式中,最古老的PRAM模式因为不切实际而被抛弃了。另外两个,LogP和BSP,仍然存在,但没有逃脱上述冲突。每个模型执行/匹配不同的并行编程风格。更糟糕的是,这两种风格都不完全符合当前并行和分布式编程的主流风格:MPI消息传递。演讲将着重于BSP,它的弱点和优势。作为开发示例,我们将使用两种编程范例:嵌套数据并行和流水线。C
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信