Prospects of Legal Regulating Use of Driverless Transportation Vehicles in the Russian Federation

A. Deineko
{"title":"Prospects of Legal Regulating Use of Driverless Transportation Vehicles in the Russian Federation","authors":"A. Deineko","doi":"10.17323/2713-2749.2021.3.33.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article reviews the new Russian legislation introducing the experimental legal regime for the use of highly automated transportation vehicles (HATVs) (driverless vehicles) on public roads. The article analyzes strategic planning documents related to the subject, such as the governmental Traffic Safety Concept for Public Roads with Driverless Transportation Vehicles (DTVs) and the European Union’s documents regulating the use of robots and artificial intelligence (AI). Drafts of the relevant laws presently at the stage of public debate or discussion at the Duma are reviewed. The Russian experience of legal regulation is compared to the international experience, with conclusions made about possible directions for the development of the legislation. The article broaches the issues of apportioning tort and administrative liability for damage caused by the use of HATVs or as a result of a breach of the road rules by such vehicles. The obvious hurdles in the way of imposing liability on a robot or an AI algorithm underscore the need to hold on to the classic tort liability model adjudicating claims of damage caused by hazardous objects and modify this model to make is usable for situations when damage is caused by a DTV. In a separate section, this article addresses issues related to the use of delivery robots — the objects do not fit the definition of transportation vehicles provided in the road rules and in the drafts of legal acts currently being prepared. The conclusion is made that judicial opinions should provide clarifications for accidents involving such vehicles because, moving along sidewalks and crossing traffic areas, they are actually road users. As for risks for personal rights and freedoms associated with the use of DTVs, this writer focuses on risks related to","PeriodicalId":410740,"journal":{"name":"Legal Issues in the Digital Age","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Issues in the Digital Age","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/2713-2749.2021.3.33.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article reviews the new Russian legislation introducing the experimental legal regime for the use of highly automated transportation vehicles (HATVs) (driverless vehicles) on public roads. The article analyzes strategic planning documents related to the subject, such as the governmental Traffic Safety Concept for Public Roads with Driverless Transportation Vehicles (DTVs) and the European Union’s documents regulating the use of robots and artificial intelligence (AI). Drafts of the relevant laws presently at the stage of public debate or discussion at the Duma are reviewed. The Russian experience of legal regulation is compared to the international experience, with conclusions made about possible directions for the development of the legislation. The article broaches the issues of apportioning tort and administrative liability for damage caused by the use of HATVs or as a result of a breach of the road rules by such vehicles. The obvious hurdles in the way of imposing liability on a robot or an AI algorithm underscore the need to hold on to the classic tort liability model adjudicating claims of damage caused by hazardous objects and modify this model to make is usable for situations when damage is caused by a DTV. In a separate section, this article addresses issues related to the use of delivery robots — the objects do not fit the definition of transportation vehicles provided in the road rules and in the drafts of legal acts currently being prepared. The conclusion is made that judicial opinions should provide clarifications for accidents involving such vehicles because, moving along sidewalks and crossing traffic areas, they are actually road users. As for risks for personal rights and freedoms associated with the use of DTVs, this writer focuses on risks related to
俄罗斯联邦法律规范无人驾驶交通工具使用的前景
本文回顾了新的俄罗斯立法,介绍了在公共道路上使用高度自动化运输车辆(hatv)(无人驾驶车辆)的实验性法律制度。本文分析了与该主题相关的战略规划文件,例如政府的“无人驾驶运输车辆(DTVs)公共道路交通安全概念”和欧盟规范机器人和人工智能(AI)使用的文件。对目前处于公开辩论或杜马讨论阶段的有关法律草案进行审查。将俄罗斯的法律规制经验与国际经验进行比较,并对立法的可能发展方向作出结论。本文探讨了因使用高空交通工具或因其违反道路规则而造成损害的侵权责任和行政责任的分配问题。在对机器人或人工智能算法施加责任的过程中存在明显的障碍,这突显出有必要坚持传统的侵权责任模型,对危险物体造成的损害进行裁决,并对该模型进行修改,使其适用于数字电视造成损害的情况。在一个单独的章节中,本文讨论了与使用送货机器人相关的问题——这些物体不符合道路规则和目前正在制定的法律草案中提供的运输车辆的定义。得出的结论是,司法意见应澄清涉及此类车辆的事故,因为它们沿着人行道和穿越交通区域行驶,实际上是道路使用者。至于与使用数码电视有关的个人权利和自由的风险,笔者着重讨论与以下有关的风险
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信