From Primitive Woods to Cultivated Woodlots: Thoreau and the Forest History of Concord, Massachusetts

G. Whitney, W. C. Davis
{"title":"From Primitive Woods to Cultivated Woodlots: Thoreau and the Forest History of Concord, Massachusetts","authors":"G. Whitney, W. C. Davis","doi":"10.2307/4004930","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"U ntil very recently most American plant ecologists adhered to the concept of the forest as a stable self-replicating entity composed of the more shadetolerant species. As Raup noted, the climax or the relatively undisturbed, pristine presettlement forest was taken as a biological baseline against which various forest management practices were evaluated.' Like the pendulum, however, which swings from one extreme to another, ecological theory of late has shifted attention from stable forest systems to \"forest history,\" seen as a chronicle of various \"disasters\" in the life of a given forest.' Today forests are often depicted as mosaics of even-aged woodland patches in various stages of recovery following disturbance. The ecological literature is replete with studies of the impact of fire, windthrows, and other natural disturbances on the structure of the forest,\" but ecologists have paid considerably less attention to the effects of routine or repetitive human activities on the composition of the forest, or have taken these effects for granted as the background for ecological analysis. Despite their seemingly tranquil nature today, most","PeriodicalId":246151,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Forest History","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"34","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Forest History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/4004930","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 34

Abstract

U ntil very recently most American plant ecologists adhered to the concept of the forest as a stable self-replicating entity composed of the more shadetolerant species. As Raup noted, the climax or the relatively undisturbed, pristine presettlement forest was taken as a biological baseline against which various forest management practices were evaluated.' Like the pendulum, however, which swings from one extreme to another, ecological theory of late has shifted attention from stable forest systems to "forest history," seen as a chronicle of various "disasters" in the life of a given forest.' Today forests are often depicted as mosaics of even-aged woodland patches in various stages of recovery following disturbance. The ecological literature is replete with studies of the impact of fire, windthrows, and other natural disturbances on the structure of the forest," but ecologists have paid considerably less attention to the effects of routine or repetitive human activities on the composition of the forest, or have taken these effects for granted as the background for ecological analysis. Despite their seemingly tranquil nature today, most
从原始森林到开垦林地:梭罗与马萨诸塞州康科德的森林史
但直到最近,大多数美国植物生态学家都坚持认为森林是一个稳定的自我复制实体,由更耐阴的物种组成。正如劳普所指出的那样,顶极或相对未受干扰的原始预定居森林被作为生物基线,各种森林管理实践被评估。然而,就像钟摆一样,从一个极端摆动到另一个极端,最近的生态理论已经将注意力从稳定的森林系统转移到“森林史”上,被视为特定森林生命中各种“灾难”的编年史。今天,森林通常被描述为处于干扰后不同恢复阶段的年龄均匀的林地斑块的马赛克。生态学文献中充满了对火灾、风和其他自然干扰对森林结构的影响的研究,“但是生态学家对日常或重复的人类活动对森林构成的影响的关注相当少,或者把这些影响理所当然地作为生态分析的背景。”尽管它们今天看起来很平静,但大多数
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信