Inappropriate Choice of Definites in Turkish Heritage Speakers of German

IF 0.7
C. Felser, Seçkin Arslan
{"title":"Inappropriate Choice of Definites in Turkish Heritage Speakers of German","authors":"C. Felser, Seçkin Arslan","doi":"10.46538/HLJ.16.1.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The appropriate use of (in-)definites can be notoriously difficult for language learners to\nacquire, suggesting that this linguistic domain is particularly prone to instability in language acquisition. The current study investigates whether heritage speakers also have difficulties in this domain. We report the results from a questionnaire study investigating heritage speakers’ sensitivity to contextual cues to the appropriate use of (in-)definites both in their native language (Turkish) and in their second, societally dominant language (German). The results show that Turkish heritage speakers over-use definite noun phrases in contexts that normally require an indefinite noun phrase in both Turkish and German, in comparison to non-bilingual Turkish and German-speaking controls. This indicates that sensitivity to pragmatic constraints on the use of (in-)definites is reduced in languages that were acquired under conditions that differ from those of typical monolingually raised speakers, regardless of the age at which these languages were acquired or how definiteness is expressed morphosyntactically. Instead, our heritage speakers’ daily use of Turkish proved to be the strongest predictor for their performance. Together, our findings indicate divergent attainment in both of our heritage speakers’ languages, with pragmatic constraints on the use of (in-) definites being weakened in both Turkish and German.","PeriodicalId":424930,"journal":{"name":"Heritage Language Journal","volume":"46 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heritage Language Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46538/HLJ.16.1.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The appropriate use of (in-)definites can be notoriously difficult for language learners to acquire, suggesting that this linguistic domain is particularly prone to instability in language acquisition. The current study investigates whether heritage speakers also have difficulties in this domain. We report the results from a questionnaire study investigating heritage speakers’ sensitivity to contextual cues to the appropriate use of (in-)definites both in their native language (Turkish) and in their second, societally dominant language (German). The results show that Turkish heritage speakers over-use definite noun phrases in contexts that normally require an indefinite noun phrase in both Turkish and German, in comparison to non-bilingual Turkish and German-speaking controls. This indicates that sensitivity to pragmatic constraints on the use of (in-)definites is reduced in languages that were acquired under conditions that differ from those of typical monolingually raised speakers, regardless of the age at which these languages were acquired or how definiteness is expressed morphosyntactically. Instead, our heritage speakers’ daily use of Turkish proved to be the strongest predictor for their performance. Together, our findings indicate divergent attainment in both of our heritage speakers’ languages, with pragmatic constraints on the use of (in-) definites being weakened in both Turkish and German.
土耳其裔德语使用者对定义词的不当选择
对于语言学习者来说,适当使用定义词是非常困难的,这表明这一语言领域在语言习得中特别容易出现不稳定。目前的研究调查了传统语言者在这方面是否也有困难。我们报告了一项问卷调查研究的结果,该研究调查了传统语言使用者在其母语(土耳其语)和第二种社会主导语言(德语)中对上下文线索的敏感性,以适当使用(in-)定义。结果表明,与非双语的土耳其语和德语对照相比,土耳其裔发言者在通常需要土耳其语和德语中不确定名词短语的语境中过度使用确定名词短语。这表明,在与典型的单语培养者不同的条件下习得的语言中,对(中)定定性使用的语用限制的敏感性降低了,而不管这些语言是在什么年龄习得的,也不管定定性是如何在形态句法上表达的。相反,我们的传统发言者的日常使用土耳其语被证明是他们表现的最强预测因素。总之,我们的研究结果表明,在这两种传统语言中,使用(in-)定义词的语用限制在土耳其语和德语中都被削弱了。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书