Slovak Views of Ukraine (1880–1914)

Dana Huсhkova, Valeria Chernak
{"title":"Slovak Views of Ukraine (1880–1914)","authors":"Dana Huсhkova, Valeria Chernak","doi":"10.33608/0236-1477.2019.04.51-63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Ukrainian themes appeared in the Slovak context of the period 1880–1914 within three thematic lines: 1) the Slavophilic line (a wide complex of ideological, historical, linguistic, ethnological, confessional and cultural issues concerning Russia and Eastern Slavs); 2) the documentary factual line (travelogue narratives); and 3) the literary line (translations of Ukrainian literary works and information about the Ukrainian literary life in the genres of literary journalism). These lines overlapped, but the first one, i.e. ideologically-based line of Slavic solidarity, was the most significant. This line substantially determined the nature of the Slovak views on the Ukrainian religious life, emancipation movement (in correlation ‘Little Russia’ – ‘Great Russia’), institutions, personally witnessed affairs and also the Ukrainian literature. In terms of the conservative national discourse, the Ukrainian independence movement was represented as a manifestation of separatism and the distinct Ukrainian nationality was rejected or questioned. Its acceptance was a matter of the later period. The interliterary contacts were sporadic and occasional. At the beginning of the 20th century, under the influence of the modernization and liberal attitude of the rising generation to the right of self-determination, the Ukrainian literature was primarily perceived as a literature of a close Slavic nation, which was, as well as the Slovak nation, in the position of an oppressed ethnic group lacking its own political independence.","PeriodicalId":413949,"journal":{"name":"Академічний журнал \"Слово і Час\"","volume":"79 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Академічний журнал \"Слово і Час\"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.33608/0236-1477.2019.04.51-63","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Ukrainian themes appeared in the Slovak context of the period 1880–1914 within three thematic lines: 1) the Slavophilic line (a wide complex of ideological, historical, linguistic, ethnological, confessional and cultural issues concerning Russia and Eastern Slavs); 2) the documentary factual line (travelogue narratives); and 3) the literary line (translations of Ukrainian literary works and information about the Ukrainian literary life in the genres of literary journalism). These lines overlapped, but the first one, i.e. ideologically-based line of Slavic solidarity, was the most significant. This line substantially determined the nature of the Slovak views on the Ukrainian religious life, emancipation movement (in correlation ‘Little Russia’ – ‘Great Russia’), institutions, personally witnessed affairs and also the Ukrainian literature. In terms of the conservative national discourse, the Ukrainian independence movement was represented as a manifestation of separatism and the distinct Ukrainian nationality was rejected or questioned. Its acceptance was a matter of the later period. The interliterary contacts were sporadic and occasional. At the beginning of the 20th century, under the influence of the modernization and liberal attitude of the rising generation to the right of self-determination, the Ukrainian literature was primarily perceived as a literature of a close Slavic nation, which was, as well as the Slovak nation, in the position of an oppressed ethnic group lacking its own political independence.
斯洛伐克对乌克兰的看法(1880-1914)
乌克兰主题出现在1880-1914年期间的斯洛伐克语境中,分为三个主题线:1)亲斯拉夫线(关于俄罗斯和东斯拉夫人的意识形态、历史、语言、民族学、忏悔和文化问题的广泛综合体);2)纪实线(游记叙事);3)文学路线(乌克兰文学作品的翻译和文学新闻流派中有关乌克兰文学生活的信息)。这两条线是重叠的,但第一条线,即基于意识形态的斯拉夫团结线,是最重要的。这条路线在很大程度上决定了斯洛伐克人对乌克兰宗教生活、解放运动(与“小俄罗斯”-“大俄罗斯”相关)、机构、亲眼目睹的事件以及乌克兰文学的看法的性质。在保守的民族话语方面,乌克兰独立运动被描绘成一种分离主义的表现,独特的乌克兰民族被拒绝或质疑。它的接受是后来的事。文学间的接触是零星和偶然的。20世纪初,在新兴一代对民族自决权的现代化和自由主义态度的影响下,乌克兰文学主要被认为是一个接近斯拉夫民族的文学,这个民族和斯洛伐克民族一样,处于一个缺乏自己政治独立的被压迫民族的地位。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信