Grappling with The Glasgow Effect: A critical artistic pedagogy to explode destructive success fantasies

Anna McLauchlan
{"title":"Grappling with The Glasgow Effect: A critical artistic pedagogy to explode destructive success fantasies","authors":"Anna McLauchlan","doi":"10.1386/aps_00067_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The Glasgow Effect is the name given to a public health mystery: Why do people in Glasgow, Scotland, die younger than similar post-industrial UK cities such as Manchester and Liverpool? Ellie Harrison appropriated this name to title an artwork where she confined herself to Glasgow for 2016. During that year the only vehicle Harrison used was her bike and she actively engaged with a variety of communities where she lives. The artwork’s invocation of Glasgow’s poor health record in combination with the £15,000 of public funding awarded to Harrison hit a nerve with some Glaswegians that led to outrage on Facebook. Subsequently, Harrison and her artwork were demonized by a broader UK media. Why fund a middle-class English artist’s ‘poverty safari’ in Glasgow when so many others never have the chance to leave? This article grapples with the educative potential of The Glasgow Effect. Harrison began the project because her teaching job in Dundee required her to ‘write and submit a significant research grant application’. That application’s success prohibited Harrison from travelling from her home in Glasgow to her job in Dundee; making her unable to teach. By enacting a complete dematerialization of markers of success – motorized travel and related carbon emissions – the artwork, and subsequent book, publicly challenge preconceived notions of ‘good career progression’, offering a critical artistic pedagogy that explodes success fantasies that hang on internationalization, excess travel and ultimately vast amounts of carbon emissions.","PeriodicalId":335951,"journal":{"name":"Art & the Public Sphere","volume":"30 3","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art & the Public Sphere","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/aps_00067_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Glasgow Effect is the name given to a public health mystery: Why do people in Glasgow, Scotland, die younger than similar post-industrial UK cities such as Manchester and Liverpool? Ellie Harrison appropriated this name to title an artwork where she confined herself to Glasgow for 2016. During that year the only vehicle Harrison used was her bike and she actively engaged with a variety of communities where she lives. The artwork’s invocation of Glasgow’s poor health record in combination with the £15,000 of public funding awarded to Harrison hit a nerve with some Glaswegians that led to outrage on Facebook. Subsequently, Harrison and her artwork were demonized by a broader UK media. Why fund a middle-class English artist’s ‘poverty safari’ in Glasgow when so many others never have the chance to leave? This article grapples with the educative potential of The Glasgow Effect. Harrison began the project because her teaching job in Dundee required her to ‘write and submit a significant research grant application’. That application’s success prohibited Harrison from travelling from her home in Glasgow to her job in Dundee; making her unable to teach. By enacting a complete dematerialization of markers of success – motorized travel and related carbon emissions – the artwork, and subsequent book, publicly challenge preconceived notions of ‘good career progression’, offering a critical artistic pedagogy that explodes success fantasies that hang on internationalization, excess travel and ultimately vast amounts of carbon emissions.
与格拉斯哥效应的斗争:一种批判的艺术教育学,以爆发破坏性的成功幻想
“格拉斯哥效应”指的是一个公共健康之谜:为什么苏格兰格拉斯哥的人比曼彻斯特和利物浦等类似的后工业城市的人死得更早?艾莉·哈里森(Ellie Harrison)挪用了这个名字来命名一件艺术品,她在2016年将自己限制在格拉斯哥。在那一年里,哈里森使用的唯一交通工具是她的自行车,她积极参与了她所居住的各种社区。这幅作品提到了格拉斯哥糟糕的健康记录,再加上哈里森获得了1.5万英镑的公共资金,这触动了一些格拉斯哥人的神经,在Facebook上引发了愤怒。随后,哈里森和她的作品被更广泛的英国媒体妖魔化。为什么要资助一个中产阶级英国艺术家在格拉斯哥的“贫困之旅”,而其他许多人却从来没有机会离开?本文探讨了格拉斯哥效应的教育潜力。哈里森之所以开始这个项目,是因为她在邓迪的教学工作要求她“撰写并提交一份重要的研究经费申请”。申请的成功阻止了哈里森从格拉斯哥的家到她在邓迪的工作;使她无法教书。通过将成功的标志——汽车旅行和相关的碳排放——完全去物化,这一艺术作品和随后的书公开挑战了“良好职业发展”的先入之见,提供了一种批判性的艺术教学方法,打破了对国际化、过度旅行和最终大量碳排放的成功幻想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信