{"title":"Medium-Scale Experiments on Stabilizing Riser-Slug Flow","authors":"Heidi Sivertsen, V. Alstad, S. Skogestad","doi":"10.2118/120040-PA","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Original SPE manuscript received for review 24 July 2008. Revised manuscript received for review 11 May 2009. Paper (SPE 120040) peer approved 23 May 2009. Summary This is the second of two papers describing control experiments on a medium-scale slug rig. The first paper (Sivertsen et al. 2009) describes experiments performed on a small-scale laboratory rig built at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) Department of Chemical Engineering. These experiments showed that, despite noisy measurements, it is possible, with feedback control, to “stabilize the flow” (i.e., to achieve reasonably smooth flow in the normally riser-induced severe slug-flow region) using only topside measurements. The question to be answered is whether these results also apply for larger riser systems. In the present paper, we look at some results obtained from a 10-m-high, 3-in.-diameter medium-scale test rig located at the Statoil Research Centre in Porsgrunn, Norway. Several cascade control structures are tested and compared, both with each other and with the results obtained from the small-scale NTNU loop. The rig was also modeled and analyzed using a simple three-state dynamic model. The new experiments were successful and confirm the results of Sivertsen et al. (2009) from the small-scale rig. The valve opening with nonslug flow operation could be increased from approximately 12% with no control to almost 24% with control using topside measurements only. This makes it possible to produce with a larger production rate and increase the total recovery from the producing oil field. The valve opening with control could be further increased to approximately 28% using measurements from the bottom of the riser, but such measurements may not be available in many cases.","PeriodicalId":335535,"journal":{"name":"Spe Projects Facilities & Construction","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spe Projects Facilities & Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/120040-PA","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17
Abstract
Original SPE manuscript received for review 24 July 2008. Revised manuscript received for review 11 May 2009. Paper (SPE 120040) peer approved 23 May 2009. Summary This is the second of two papers describing control experiments on a medium-scale slug rig. The first paper (Sivertsen et al. 2009) describes experiments performed on a small-scale laboratory rig built at the Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU) Department of Chemical Engineering. These experiments showed that, despite noisy measurements, it is possible, with feedback control, to “stabilize the flow” (i.e., to achieve reasonably smooth flow in the normally riser-induced severe slug-flow region) using only topside measurements. The question to be answered is whether these results also apply for larger riser systems. In the present paper, we look at some results obtained from a 10-m-high, 3-in.-diameter medium-scale test rig located at the Statoil Research Centre in Porsgrunn, Norway. Several cascade control structures are tested and compared, both with each other and with the results obtained from the small-scale NTNU loop. The rig was also modeled and analyzed using a simple three-state dynamic model. The new experiments were successful and confirm the results of Sivertsen et al. (2009) from the small-scale rig. The valve opening with nonslug flow operation could be increased from approximately 12% with no control to almost 24% with control using topside measurements only. This makes it possible to produce with a larger production rate and increase the total recovery from the producing oil field. The valve opening with control could be further increased to approximately 28% using measurements from the bottom of the riser, but such measurements may not be available in many cases.
2008年7月24日收到SPE原稿。2009年5月11日收到审稿。论文(SPE 120040)同行批准2009年5月23日。这是两篇描述中型段塞流钻井平台控制实验的论文中的第二篇。第一篇论文(Sivertsen et al. 2009)描述了在挪威科技大学(NTNU)化学工程系建造的小型实验室平台上进行的实验。这些实验表明,尽管有噪声测量,但通过反馈控制,仅使用上部测量就可以“稳定流动”(即在通常由立管引起的严重段塞流区域实现相当平稳的流动)。需要回答的问题是,这些结果是否也适用于更大的立管系统。在本文中,我们研究了从一个10米高、3英寸高的管道中获得的一些结果。位于挪威国家石油公司研究中心Porsgrunn的中型测试平台。对几种串级控制结构进行了测试和比较,并与小尺度NTNU回路的结果进行了比较。利用简单的三态动态模型对钻机进行了建模和分析。新的实验是成功的,并证实了Sivertsen等人(2009)在小型钻机上的结果。无段塞流操作的阀门开度可以从无控制的约12%增加到仅使用上层测量控制的近24%。这使得以更大的产量进行生产并提高生产油田的总采收率成为可能。通过从立管底部进行测量,控制阀的开度可以进一步增加到约28%,但在许多情况下,这种测量方法可能无法实现。