The elephant in the room: Health information system security and the user-level environment

J. Fernando
{"title":"The elephant in the room: Health information system security and the user-level environment","authors":"J. Fernando","doi":"10.1109/ICITST.2009.5402503","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The patient care context comprises outdated infrastructure, pervasive computer use, shared clinical workspace, aural privacy shortcomings, interruptive work settings, confusing legislation, poor privacy and security (P&S) eHealth training outcomes and inadequate budgets. Twenty three medical, nursing and allied health clinicians working in Australia (Victoria) participated in qualitative research examining work practices with P&S for patient care. They criticised a slow, inefficient eHealth information system (eHIS) environment permeated by usability errors. EHealth systems expanded workloads and system demands were onerous, increasing the clinicians' scepticism of reliance on information technology. Consequently many clinicians had developed trade-offs to avoid reliance an eHIS. The trade-offs include IT support avoidance and shared passwords to PKI and computer accounts. Handover-sheets populated by transcribed notes were circulated between all clinicians present. The practices ensure paper persistence and escalate P&S threats to data confidentiality, integrity and availability. Study evidence suggests poor eHISs hamper patient care and may represent a larger P&S threat than indicated by studies to date.","PeriodicalId":251169,"journal":{"name":"2009 International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions, (ICITST)","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2009 International Conference for Internet Technology and Secured Transactions, (ICITST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICITST.2009.5402503","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

The patient care context comprises outdated infrastructure, pervasive computer use, shared clinical workspace, aural privacy shortcomings, interruptive work settings, confusing legislation, poor privacy and security (P&S) eHealth training outcomes and inadequate budgets. Twenty three medical, nursing and allied health clinicians working in Australia (Victoria) participated in qualitative research examining work practices with P&S for patient care. They criticised a slow, inefficient eHealth information system (eHIS) environment permeated by usability errors. EHealth systems expanded workloads and system demands were onerous, increasing the clinicians' scepticism of reliance on information technology. Consequently many clinicians had developed trade-offs to avoid reliance an eHIS. The trade-offs include IT support avoidance and shared passwords to PKI and computer accounts. Handover-sheets populated by transcribed notes were circulated between all clinicians present. The practices ensure paper persistence and escalate P&S threats to data confidentiality, integrity and availability. Study evidence suggests poor eHISs hamper patient care and may represent a larger P&S threat than indicated by studies to date.
房间里的大象:卫生信息系统安全和用户级环境
患者护理环境包括过时的基础设施、普及的计算机使用、共享的临床工作空间、听觉隐私缺陷、中断的工作环境、令人困惑的立法、糟糕的隐私和安全(P&S)电子健康培训成果以及预算不足。23名在澳大利亚(维多利亚州)工作的医疗、护理和联合保健临床医生参加了一项定性研究,检查了P&S在病人护理方面的工作实践。他们批评了一个缓慢、低效的电子健康信息系统(eHIS)环境,其中充斥着可用性错误。电子卫生系统增加了工作量,系统需求繁重,增加了临床医生对依赖信息技术的怀疑。因此,许多临床医生已经开发了权衡,以避免依赖eHIS。折衷包括避免IT支持和共享PKI和计算机帐户的密码。在所有在场的临床医生之间传阅记录记录的交接表。这些做法确保了纸张的持久性,并加剧了P&S对数据机密性、完整性和可用性的威胁。研究证据表明,较差的eHISs妨碍了患者护理,并可能比迄今为止的研究表明的更大的P&S威胁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信