Incidence and Nature of Negotiations for Meaning during Uncontrolled Speaking Practice in English as a Foreign Language Classrooms

E. E. García-Ponce, Irasema Mora-Pablo
{"title":"Incidence and Nature of Negotiations for Meaning during Uncontrolled Speaking Practice in English as a Foreign Language Classrooms","authors":"E. E. García-Ponce, Irasema Mora-Pablo","doi":"10.17323/2411-7390-2018-4-1-31-41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The past three decades have seen an increasing interest in negotiation for meaning as interactional processes which advance language acquisition. Motivated by this claim, a number of studies have set out to determine the tasks that best promote negotiations for meaning (NfMs). However, this research has mostly tended to investigate NfM under experimental conditions, leaving considerably unexplored the negotiated interactions that might take place in real English as a foreign language (EFL) classrooms. In response to this, the present study sets out to investigate the incidence and nature of NfM in three uncontrolled EFL classrooms. In examining several teacher- and learner-led speaking tasks at basic, intermediate and advanced levels, the findings indicate that the amount of NfM is lower than those reported in previous studies. Moreover, a qualitative analysis of the interactional data suggests that the NfM across proficiency levels was limited in nature, and thus did not provide learners with all the learning benefits inherent in negotiation for meaning. These findings raise intriguing questions as to teachers’ and learners’ opportunities to negotiate meaning during EFL classroom interactions, and ways through which they can promote negotiated interactions in their EFL classrooms. \nThis article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.","PeriodicalId":339853,"journal":{"name":"Linguistic Anthropology eJournal","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistic Anthropology eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17323/2411-7390-2018-4-1-31-41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The past three decades have seen an increasing interest in negotiation for meaning as interactional processes which advance language acquisition. Motivated by this claim, a number of studies have set out to determine the tasks that best promote negotiations for meaning (NfMs). However, this research has mostly tended to investigate NfM under experimental conditions, leaving considerably unexplored the negotiated interactions that might take place in real English as a foreign language (EFL) classrooms. In response to this, the present study sets out to investigate the incidence and nature of NfM in three uncontrolled EFL classrooms. In examining several teacher- and learner-led speaking tasks at basic, intermediate and advanced levels, the findings indicate that the amount of NfM is lower than those reported in previous studies. Moreover, a qualitative analysis of the interactional data suggests that the NfM across proficiency levels was limited in nature, and thus did not provide learners with all the learning benefits inherent in negotiation for meaning. These findings raise intriguing questions as to teachers’ and learners’ opportunities to negotiate meaning during EFL classroom interactions, and ways through which they can promote negotiated interactions in their EFL classrooms. This article is published under the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
英语课堂非受控口语练习中意义协商的发生率和性质
在过去的三十年里,人们对意义的协商越来越感兴趣,因为它是促进语言习得的互动过程。在这一观点的推动下,许多研究开始确定最能促进意义谈判(nfm)的任务。然而,这项研究大多倾向于在实验条件下调查NfM,而对可能在真实的英语作为外语(EFL)课堂上发生的协商互动进行了相当大的探索。针对这一点,本研究着手调查三个非受控英语课堂中NfM的发生率和性质。在对基础、中级和高级水平的几个教师和学习者主导的口语任务进行研究后,研究结果表明,NfM的数量比以前的研究报告要低。此外,对互动数据的定性分析表明,跨熟练程度的NfM在本质上是有限的,因此并没有为学习者提供意义谈判所固有的所有学习好处。这些发现提出了一些有趣的问题,即教师和学习者在课堂互动中协商意义的机会,以及他们如何在课堂上促进协商互动。本文基于知识共享署名4.0国际许可协议发布。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信