Prediction of Fracture Toughness Temperature Dependence Over a Wide Temperature Range Using Simplified and Direct Scaling Method

Takashi Inoue, T. Meshii
{"title":"Prediction of Fracture Toughness Temperature Dependence Over a Wide Temperature Range Using Simplified and Direct Scaling Method","authors":"Takashi Inoue, T. Meshii","doi":"10.1115/PVP2018-84172","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The fracture toughness KJc of the material in the ductile to brittle transition temperature (DBTT) range exhibits both test specimen thickness (TST) dependence and temperature dependence. Attention has been paid to the master curve (MC) method, which provides an engineering approach to address these two issues. Although MC is intended to be applied to arbitrary ferritic material whose yield stress is within the range of 275 to 825 MPa, the KJc value must be obtained to determine the material dependent reference temperature T0. The applicable range of MC method is restricted to T0 ± 50 °C. Previous studies indicate that additional pre-tests to obtain T0 are necessary; thus, there might be some unwritten requirement to the test temperature for the KJc temperature dependence prediction in MC method to work effectively. If testing must be conducted for the material of interest at some restricted temperature, a more flexible KJc temperature dependence prediction can possibly be obtained for a wide temperature range in the DBTT range, if the simplified and direct scaling (SDS) method, which predicts fracture “load” from yield stress temperature dependence proposed previously is applied. In this study, the SDS method was applied to two different steels: Cr-Mo steel JIS SCM440 and 0.55% carbon steel JIS S55C. Both tensile and fracture toughness tests were performed over a wide range of temperatures, specifically, −166 to 100 °C for SCM440 and −166 to 20 °C for S55C. The SDS method (i.e., fracture load is proportional to 1/(yield stress)) was initially validated for the specimens in the DBTT range. Finally, a simplified method was proposed and initially validated to predict the KJc temperature dependence, by applying the SDS using the EPRI plastic J functional form.","PeriodicalId":384066,"journal":{"name":"Volume 3B: Design and Analysis","volume":"83 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Volume 3B: Design and Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1115/PVP2018-84172","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The fracture toughness KJc of the material in the ductile to brittle transition temperature (DBTT) range exhibits both test specimen thickness (TST) dependence and temperature dependence. Attention has been paid to the master curve (MC) method, which provides an engineering approach to address these two issues. Although MC is intended to be applied to arbitrary ferritic material whose yield stress is within the range of 275 to 825 MPa, the KJc value must be obtained to determine the material dependent reference temperature T0. The applicable range of MC method is restricted to T0 ± 50 °C. Previous studies indicate that additional pre-tests to obtain T0 are necessary; thus, there might be some unwritten requirement to the test temperature for the KJc temperature dependence prediction in MC method to work effectively. If testing must be conducted for the material of interest at some restricted temperature, a more flexible KJc temperature dependence prediction can possibly be obtained for a wide temperature range in the DBTT range, if the simplified and direct scaling (SDS) method, which predicts fracture “load” from yield stress temperature dependence proposed previously is applied. In this study, the SDS method was applied to two different steels: Cr-Mo steel JIS SCM440 and 0.55% carbon steel JIS S55C. Both tensile and fracture toughness tests were performed over a wide range of temperatures, specifically, −166 to 100 °C for SCM440 and −166 to 20 °C for S55C. The SDS method (i.e., fracture load is proportional to 1/(yield stress)) was initially validated for the specimens in the DBTT range. Finally, a simplified method was proposed and initially validated to predict the KJc temperature dependence, by applying the SDS using the EPRI plastic J functional form.
用简化和直接标度法预测大温度范围内断裂韧性与温度的关系
材料在韧脆转变温度(DBTT)范围内的断裂韧性KJc表现出试样厚度(TST)依赖性和温度依赖性。主曲线法(MC)为解决这两个问题提供了一种工程方法。虽然MC拟应用于屈服应力在275 ~ 825 MPa范围内的任意铁素体材料,但必须获得KJc值才能确定与材料相关的参考温度T0。MC法的适用范围限于T0±50°C。以前的研究表明,需要额外的预测试来获得T0;因此,为了使MC方法中的KJc温度依赖预测有效地工作,可能对测试温度有一些不成文的要求。如果必须在某些限制温度下对感兴趣的材料进行测试,那么如果采用先前提出的简化和直接标度(SDS)方法,该方法可以根据屈服应力温度依赖预测断裂“载荷”,则可以在DBTT范围内的宽温度范围内获得更灵活的KJc温度依赖预测。在本研究中,SDS方法应用于两种不同的钢:铬钼钢JIS SCM440和0.55%碳钢JIS S55C。拉伸和断裂韧性测试在很宽的温度范围内进行,具体来说,SCM440的温度范围为- 166至100°C, S55C的温度范围为- 166至20°C。SDS方法(即断裂载荷与1/(屈服应力)成正比)在DBTT范围内的试样中进行了初步验证。最后,提出了一种简化的方法,并初步验证了该方法的有效性,即使用EPRI塑性J函数形式的SDS来预测KJc温度依赖性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信