Bashed and Wounded: The Performance of Vulnerability in Policing

S. Whitehead
{"title":"Bashed and Wounded: The Performance of Vulnerability in Policing","authors":"S. Whitehead","doi":"10.11648/J.IJLS.20210402.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article centers on the sense of vulnerability and victimization felt by police officers in the United States. Of particular interest is how officers feel victimized by individuals and groups who offer critiques of police organizations. An analysis of the affective expressions of this sense of victimization through conversations with officers and trainers from a state in the Midwest, United States, illustrates a lingering antagonism between police and those deemed outsiders. This article specifically examines the interpretive strategies and cultural logic officers use to make meaning of themselves as victims of what they deem as unjustifiable criticism and critique by those outside the police institution. This work illustrates that the use of such rhetorical tropes as 'cop bashing' can be understood as a form of culture work used to silence alternative interpretations of policing in general and police work in particular. The culture work of ‘bashing’ is thus part of the cultural milieu of policing and feeds distrust in police organizations making it hard to offer meaningful critiques and recommendations for improving police work and policing organizations. Findings are discussed in relation to the implications for critical policing studies and the politics of knowledge at play in interpretations of policing actions.","PeriodicalId":375311,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Law and Society","volume":"14 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Law and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11648/J.IJLS.20210402.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article centers on the sense of vulnerability and victimization felt by police officers in the United States. Of particular interest is how officers feel victimized by individuals and groups who offer critiques of police organizations. An analysis of the affective expressions of this sense of victimization through conversations with officers and trainers from a state in the Midwest, United States, illustrates a lingering antagonism between police and those deemed outsiders. This article specifically examines the interpretive strategies and cultural logic officers use to make meaning of themselves as victims of what they deem as unjustifiable criticism and critique by those outside the police institution. This work illustrates that the use of such rhetorical tropes as 'cop bashing' can be understood as a form of culture work used to silence alternative interpretations of policing in general and police work in particular. The culture work of ‘bashing’ is thus part of the cultural milieu of policing and feeds distrust in police organizations making it hard to offer meaningful critiques and recommendations for improving police work and policing organizations. Findings are discussed in relation to the implications for critical policing studies and the politics of knowledge at play in interpretations of policing actions.
殴打和受伤:脆弱性在警务中的表现
本文以美国警察的脆弱感和受害感为中心。特别令人感兴趣的是,在批评警察组织的个人和团体面前,警官们是如何感到受害的。通过与美国中西部一个州的警官和培训师的对话,对这种受害感的情感表达进行了分析,表明警察与那些被视为局外人的人之间存在着挥之不去的敌意。本文专门研究了警官们用来使自己成为受害者的解释策略和文化逻辑,他们认为这些受害者是警察机构以外的人不合理的批评和批评的受害者。这项工作表明,使用诸如“警察殴打”之类的修辞手法可以被理解为一种文化工作形式,用于压制对一般警务和警察工作的其他解释。因此,“抨击”的文化工作是警务文化环境的一部分,助长了对警察组织的不信任,从而难以为改善警察工作和警察组织提供有意义的批评和建议。研究结果讨论了对关键警务研究的影响,以及在解释警务行动中发挥作用的知识政治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信